Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Minnesota

Good Samaritan Society, Waconia

Waconia, MN · ~194 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Good Samaritan Society, Waconia runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade D.

Good Samaritan Society, Waconia: 9.3 TCR = 143% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Good Samaritan Society, Waconia safety composite

Good Samaritan Society, Waconia scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Good Samaritan Society, Waconia held a steady TCR band

Good Samaritan Society, Waconia's TCR held near 0.1 from 9.3 in 2016 to 9.3 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.3 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.3 · 2017=9.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Waconia, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 9.3 · 143% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #256/430
  • PHOTO Chautauqua Guest Hom…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~194 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chautauqua Guest Home #3 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Good Samaritan Society, Waconia in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Good Samaritan Society, Waconia averages 9.3 TCR (143% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Good Samaritan Society, Waconia TCR series: 2016=9.3 · 2017=9.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Good Samaritan Society, Waconia falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #256 safest of 430 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Minnesota.

Good Samaritan Society, Waconia (194 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Good Samaritan Society, Waconia
Good Samaritan Society, Waconia (194 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Good Samaritan Society, Waconia has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 9.3 6.5 9 1 0
2016 9.3 6.2 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MN · Waconia

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 44 employers in Waconia, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chautauqua Guest Home #3 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jackson Manor 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Salamanca Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Apple Rehab Shelton Lakes 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 33 HSC 194 FTE
STATE-SIZE Twin Cities 194 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reviva - Corporate office and Diesel Production 194 FTE
STATE-SIZE ZF Off-Highway Solutions Minnesota Inc. 194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ridgeview Waconia 2,057 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ridgeview Medical Center 1,793 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cabinetworks Group 441 FTE
CITY-NEAR Educational Services Center 415 FTE
NAT-TCR Allentown (Pabtn) 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR San Marcos (Casmr) 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Salinas Center (Casal) 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Air Technologies 66 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Industrial Solutions : IS - MFG US - Selmer, TN - Busway 194 FTE
NAT-SIZE Williamsport (Pawll) 194 FTE
NAT-SIZE # 1 Cochran of Monroeville 194 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stateline Location 194 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.