Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment · Texas

Apple Wellness Austin

Austin, TX · ~69 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Apple Wellness Austin runs at 131% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment workplace, earning a grade D.

Apple Wellness Austin: 5.0 TCR = 131% of Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Apple Wellness Austin safety composite

Apple Wellness Austin scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Apple Wellness Austin: 3.8 → 6.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 11.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Apple Wellness Austin's TCR rose 2.5 from 3.8 in 2019 to 6.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 11.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621498 · Austin, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 131% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/21
  • PHOTO Centro De Salud Fami…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Centro De Salud Familiar La Fe (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Apple Wellness Austin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Apple Wellness Austin averages 5.0 TCR (131% of the Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Apple Wellness Austin TCR series: 2019=3.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=11 · 2023=6.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Apple Wellness Austin falls in its industry

599 Clinics/centers of health prac establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 21 Clinics/centers of health prac employers in Texas.

Apple Wellness Austin (69 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Apple Wellness Austin
Apple Wellness Austin (69 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Apple Wellness Austin has fewer employees than the Clinics/centers of health practitioners median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.3 0.0 2 0 0
2022 11.0 0.0 3 0 0
2021 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621498 · TX · Austin

599 Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Centro De Salud Familiar La Fe 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hitchcock 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lechee Clinic/ Pharmacy 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Affinity Health Center 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ring Energy Office The Woodlands 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Headquarters 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Red Rock Oil Field Services 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE NRG Cedar Bayou Generating Station 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR 3068, 3221 Keystone 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kitchen No. 324 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Republic Number One 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Olson Carriers Inc 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE GPI St. Paul 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE ARIA Technologies INC 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE JR Filanc Construction Company, Inc. 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Triangle Services - Palm Beach International Airport 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.