Community health centers and clinics, outpatient · Texas

Centro De Salud Familiar La Fe

El Paso, TX · ~252 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Centro De Salud Familiar La Fe runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Community health centers and clinics, outpatient workplace, earning a grade D.

Centro De Salud Familiar La Fe: 5.0 TCR = 132% of Community health centers and clinics, outpatient BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Centro De Salud Familiar La Fe safety composite

Centro De Salud Familiar La Fe scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Centro De Salud Familiar La Fe: 1.7 → 3.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 8.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Centro De Salud Familiar La Fe's TCR rose 2.2 from 1.7 in 2020 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621498 · El Paso, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 132% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/21
  • PHOTO Hitchcock
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~252 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hitchcock (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Centro De Salud Familiar La Fe in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Centro De Salud Familiar La Fe averages 5.0 TCR (132% of the Community health centers and clinics, outpatient BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Centro De Salud Familiar La Fe TCR series: 2020=1.7 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=6.7 · 2023=8 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Centro De Salud Familiar La Fe falls in its industry

599 Community health centers and c establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 21 Community health centers and c employers in Texas.

Centro De Salud Familiar La Fe (252 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Centro De Salud Familiar La Fe
Centro De Salud Familiar La Fe (252 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Centro De Salud Familiar La Fe has more employees than the Community health centers and clinics, ou median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 0.0 9 0 0
2023 8.0 0.0 15 0 0
2022 6.7 0.0 12 0 0
2021 4.8 1.0 10 0 0
2020 1.7 0.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621498 · TX · El Paso

599 Community health centers and clinics, outpatient employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 974 employers in El Paso, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hitchcock 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Apple Wellness Austin 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henry Ford- Jackson Downtown Campus 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santa Ynez Tribal Health Clinic 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dan Williams Company 252 FTE
STATE-SIZE Home Office 252 FTE
STATE-SIZE Azteca Milling 252 FTE
STATE-SIZE Helena Laboratories Corp - Lindbergh Drive 252 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - El Paso 2,330 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alegre Home Health Care, LLC EL PASO 1,942 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - El Paso 1,847 FTE
CITY-NEAR MVT Services, LLC 1,798 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon Retail LLC - MAB6 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon Retail LLC - MAB2 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Peak Event Services - Stoughton 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1266 Poughkeepsie 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Teel Plastics-Teel Court 252 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chrisp Company 252 FTE
NAT-SIZE BriskHeat Corporation 252 FTE
NAT-SIZE Molin Concrete Products Inc 252 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.