Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing · Indiana

Applied Composites Indianapolis

Indianapolis, IN · ~115 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Applied Composites Indianapolis runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Applied Composites Indianapolis: 2.4 TCR = 72% of Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Applied Composites Indianapolis safety composite

Applied Composites Indianapolis scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Applied Composites Indianapolis: 1.9 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 2.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.39× in 2021

Applied Composites Indianapolis's TCR rose 0.9 from 1.9 in 2020 to 2.8 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 72% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO ATK Space Systems In…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~115 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ATK Space Systems Inc. - Rancho Bernardo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Applied Composites Indianapolis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Applied Composites Indianapolis averages 2.4 TCR (72% of the Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Applied Composites Indianapolis TCR series: 2020=1.9 · 2021=2.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Applied Composites Indianapolis falls in its industry

388 Acceleration indicators and sy establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Acceleration indicators and sy employers in Indiana.

Applied Composites Indianapolis (115 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Applied Composites Indianapolis
Applied Composites Indianapolis (115 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Applied Composites Indianapolis has fewer employees than the Acceleration indicators and systems comp median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.8 0.9 3 0 0
2020 1.9 1.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · IN · Indianapolis

388 Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ATK Space Systems Inc. - Rancho Bernardo 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR NGMS-A833 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodrich ES - Atlantic Inertial Systems 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US CA San Diego Woden St (1235) 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE South Bend Svc Ctr 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Overhead Door Company Indianapolis Doors 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE AI Innovations 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Dixie - Odessa 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bartlett Milling Company, L.P. (CFM) 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Harvard Service Group Inc. of OHIO 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Waste Industries, LLC Wytheville 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE CB&I, LLC. Houston Plant 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heavy Highway 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thomas Concrete of Georgia Office 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nestle USA, Freedom Facility 115 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.