Park and recreational open space improvement construction · New Jersey
Applied Landscape Technologies
Montville, NJ · ~78 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- C
- Average Safety Record
- 2.4
- Avg TCR
- 2.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Applied Landscape Technologies runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Park and recreational open space improvement construction workplace, earning a grade C.
- C
- Average Safety Record
- 2.4
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 2.8
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 2
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Applied Landscape Technologies's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). This reflects reported recordable injuries, not an independent safety inspection -- underreporting is a known limitation of employer self-recordkeeping.
Injury rate over time
Applied Landscape Technologies's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 2.8 industry benchmark.
Where Applied Landscape Technologies falls in its industry
1,364 Park and recreational open spa establishmentsSafer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.
Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 27 Park and recreational open spa employers in New Jersey.
Applied Landscape Technologies has an average TCR of 2.4, which is 86% of the industry average (2.8) for Park and recreational open space improvement construction. This is better than average.
The letter grade is a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA ITA and BLS benchmark data, not an official OSHA rating or safety certification. Full formula and thresholds: Methodology.
Trend analysis for Applied Landscape Technologies
Between 2023 and 2024, Applied Landscape Technologies's Total Case Rate worsened from 2.2 to 2.6 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 18% increase across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2023, at a TCR of 2.2, while 2024 saw the highest rate, at 2.6, a spread of 0.4 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, Applied Landscape Technologies recorded 2 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Applied Landscape Technologies's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 237990 - Park and recreational open space improvement construction.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 77,063 hours worked = 0.00 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Applied Landscape Technologies (this establishment) | 2.40 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Earth retention system construction industry avg | 2.80 | BLS IIF, NAICS 237990 |
| New Jersey state avg (all industries) | 4.90 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Applied Landscape Technologies to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Applied Landscape Technologies's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Park and recreational open space improvement construction peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 86% of the Park and recreational open space improvement construction benchmark, Applied Landscape Technologies reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Park and recreational open space improvement construction sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Applied Landscape Technologies's safety grade?
How many injuries has Applied Landscape Technologies reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry and by workforce size within New Jersey - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~2.4)
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.