Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · Wisconsin

Applied Laser Technologies LLC

Schofield, WI · ~102 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Applied Laser Technologies LLC runs at 298% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Applied Laser Technologies LLC: 9.8 TCR = 298% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Applied Laser Technologies LLC safety composite

Applied Laser Technologies LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.9

2016→2021

Applied Laser Technologies LLC injury rate improved

Applied Laser Technologies LLC's TCR fell 12.9 from 12.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 19.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.9 · 2017=7.9 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=12.3 · 2020=19.5 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Schofield, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 298% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #45/53
  • PHOTO Applied Laser Techno…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 45 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Applied Laser Technologies Acq (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Applied Laser Technologies LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Applied Laser Technologies LLC averages 9.8 TCR (298% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Applied Laser Technologies LLC TCR series: 2016=12.9 · 2017=7.9 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=12.3 · 2020=19.5 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Applied Laser Technologies LLC falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 53 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in Wisconsin.

Applied Laser Technologies LLC (102 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Applied Laser Technologies LLC
Applied Laser Technologies LLC (102 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Applied Laser Technologies LLC has more employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 19.5 17.6 9 11 0
2019 12.3 6.6 12 1 0
2018 6.5 4.3 6 0 0
2017 7.9 4.5 7 0 0
2016 12.9 4.7 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · WI · Schofield

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 59 employers in Schofield, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Applied Laser Technologies Acq 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR FABCO STEEL FABRICATION INC 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR KINMETAL 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highland Machine 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lakeside Foods, Inc Manitowoc Plant 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holton Brothers, Inc. 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fromm Family Foods, LLC. 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clasen Quality Chocolate - Corporate 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greenheck Fan Corporation 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schofield Facility 615 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crystal Finishing Systems - Schofield 607 FTE
CITY-NEAR Asplundh Tree Expert LLC - 062 438 FTE
NAT-TCR Universal Alloy Corporation - Anaheim 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR PNV 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cowboy Charcoal - Monticello 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Arbor - Addison School District 4 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Herbalife International - Carson 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saginaw Transit Authority Regional Services 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indiana University Health Plans, Inc 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fox Valley 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.