Motor coach operation, interurban and rural · Michigan

Saginaw Transit Authority Regional Services

Saginaw, MI · ~102 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Saginaw Transit Authority Regional Services runs at 117% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Motor coach operation, interurban and rural workplace, earning a grade C.

Saginaw Transit Authority Regional Services: 5.3 TCR = 117% of Motor coach operation, interurban and rural BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Saginaw Transit Authority Regional Services safety composite

Saginaw Transit Authority Regional Services scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Saginaw Transit Authority Regional Services: 6.6 → 8.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 8.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.11× in 2021

Saginaw Transit Authority Regional Services's TCR rose 1.6 from 6.6 in 2019 to 8.2 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485210 · Saginaw, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.3 · 117% of ind

  • DART 5.8 DART
  • RANK #6/9
  • PHOTO 396 CHICO
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 396 CHICO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Saginaw Transit Authority Regional Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Saginaw Transit Authority Regional Services averages 5.3 TCR (117% of the Motor coach operation, interurban and rural BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Saginaw Transit Authority Regional Services TCR series: 2019=6.6 · 2020=1 · 2021=8.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Saginaw Transit Authority Regional Services falls in its industry

161 Motor coach operation, interur establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 9 Motor coach operation, interur employers in Michigan.

Saginaw Transit Authority Regional Services (102 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Saginaw Transit Authority Regional Services
Saginaw Transit Authority Regional Services (102 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Saginaw Transit Authority Regional Services has more employees than the Motor coach operation, interurban and ru median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 8.2 5.8 7 0 0
2020 1.0 0.6 9 1 0
2019 6.6 6.6 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485210 · MI · Saginaw

161 Motor coach operation, interurban and rural employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 278 employers in Saginaw, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 396 CHICO 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wisconsin Coach Lines / Coach USA 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR First Student 12741 Rome 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2453-00060388-0001 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Constantine, MI 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Grand Rapids-Water Administration 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE C&D Hughes, Inc. 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE CMF Group Inc Michigan 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nexteer Automotive Saginaw Site 4,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR 700 Cooper 2,129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morley - Saginaw 2,039 FTE
CITY-NEAR Caravan Facilities Management 1,677 FTE
NAT-TCR Sedano's Supermarket #5 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Accurate Corporate Services 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR WTP 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Government Services, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Herbalife International - Carson 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Applied Laser Technologies LLC 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Essentra HPC Moorestown 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Recreation Unlimited, LLC 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.