X-ray irradiation equipment manufacturing · Texas

Applied Rigaku Technologies, Inc.

Austiin, TX · ~29 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Applied Rigaku Technologies, Inc. runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical X-ray irradiation equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Applied Rigaku Technologies, Inc.: 0.0 TCR = 0% of X-ray irradiation equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Applied Rigaku Technologies, Inc. safety composite

Applied Rigaku Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Applied Rigaku Technologies, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Applied Rigaku Technologies, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.0 TCR.

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334517 · Austiin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P100
  • PHOTO Smiths Detection Inc
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Smiths Detection Inc (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Applied Rigaku Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Applied Rigaku Technologies, Inc. averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the X-ray irradiation equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Applied Rigaku Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Applied Rigaku Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

60 X-ray irradiation equipment ma establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Applied Rigaku Technologies, Inc. (29 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Applied Rigaku Technologies, Inc.
Applied Rigaku Technologies, Inc. (29 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Applied Rigaku Technologies, Inc. has fewer employees than the X-ray irradiation equipment manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334517 · TX · Austiin

60 X-ray irradiation equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Smiths Detection Inc 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bedford 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Varian, Charlottesville 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accuray Incorporated - Madison WI 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cobalt Cattle Company LLC - Hereford 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pepper Dairy 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE SROOC Holding LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE G&G Logging, LLC 29 FTE
NAT-TCR Raleigh Managed Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 128 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Integration Appliance Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Water Treatment City of Wyoming 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colonial Engineering Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Fort Myers The Colony 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hornbuckle Heating & Air Conditioning 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.