Filtration plant, water · Michigan

Water Treatment City of Wyoming

Wyoming, MI · ~29 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Water Treatment City of Wyoming runs at 502% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Filtration plant, water workplace, earning a grade F.

Water Treatment City of Wyoming: 6.0 TCR = 502% of Filtration plant, water BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Water Treatment City of Wyoming safety composite

Water Treatment City of Wyoming scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Water Treatment City of Wyoming held a steady TCR band

Water Treatment City of Wyoming's TCR held near 0.3 from 4.9 in 2016 to 5.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 14.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.9 · 2017=4.6 · 2018=13.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=14.3 · 2022=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Wyoming, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.0 · 502% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #15/26
  • PHOTO Cucamonga Valley Wat…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cucamonga Valley Water District (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Water Treatment City of Wyoming in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Water Treatment City of Wyoming averages 6.0 TCR (502% of the Filtration plant, water BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Water Treatment City of Wyoming TCR series: 2016=4.9 · 2017=4.6 · 2018=13.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=14.3 · 2022=5.2 · BLS 1.2

Where Water Treatment City of Wyoming falls in its industry

727 Filtration plant, water establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 26 Filtration plant, water employers in Michigan.

Water Treatment City of Wyoming (29 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Water Treatment City of Wyoming
Water Treatment City of Wyoming (29 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Water Treatment City of Wyoming has fewer employees than the Filtration plant, water median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.2 5.2 1 0 0
2021 14.3 4.8 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 13.1 4.3 3 0 0
2017 4.6 4.6 1 0 0
2016 4.9 4.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · MI · Wyoming

727 Filtration plant, water employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 199 employers in Wyoming, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cucamonga Valley Water District 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Artesian Wastewater Management, Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reclamation District No. 108 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Masterpiece Flower Company LLC - Merchandising (IN) 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Packing Co. Hart 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riveridge Cider 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Covert Generating Company 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Metro Health Main Hospital 1,976 FTE
CITY-NEAR MI-WYOMI08-Home Office - Wyoming MI 1,542 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIGRN - GRAND RAPIDS HUB 1,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR GRAND RAPIDS HUB (MIGRN) 1,345 FTE
NAT-TCR 9215-BTR 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Merced SHAW 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fresh Ideas Management- Beth Haven 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 100012 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE NAES : Frontera 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hornbuckle Heating & Air Conditioning 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Fort Myers The Colony 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Owens Lumber Company, Inc 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.