Transformer station and substation, electric power, construction · New Mexico

APS Four Corners - Sundt Construction

Fruitland, NM · ~258 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

APS Four Corners - Sundt Construction runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Transformer station and substation, electric power, construction workplace, earning a grade B.

APS Four Corners - Sundt Construction: 1.7 TCR = 61% of Transformer station and substation, electric power, construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

APS Four Corners - Sundt Construction safety composite

APS Four Corners - Sundt Construction scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2016→2018

APS Four Corners - Sundt Construction injury rate improved

APS Four Corners - Sundt Construction's TCR fell 2.2 from 3.1 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Fruitland, NM AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 61% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #6/10
  • PHOTO TESSCO Hobbs
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~258 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TESSCO Hobbs (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Mexico employers → · Look up another →

APS Four Corners - Sundt Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows APS Four Corners - Sundt Construction averages 1.7 TCR (61% of the Transformer station and substation, electric power, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

APS Four Corners - Sundt Construction TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=0.9 · BLS 2.8

Where APS Four Corners - Sundt Construction falls in its industry

1,605 Transformer station and substa establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Mexico alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 10 Transformer station and substa employers in New Mexico.

APS Four Corners - Sundt Construction (258 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate APS Four Corners - Sundt Construction
APS Four Corners - Sundt Construction (258 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

APS Four Corners - Sundt Construction has more employees than the Transformer station and substation, elec median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2017 1.1 0.7 5 0 0
2016 3.1 1.4 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · NM · Fruitland

1,605 Transformer station and substation, electric power, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,241 rated employers in New Mexico with headcount on file · 4 employers in Fruitland, NM · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TESSCO Hobbs 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Danella Utility Construction, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MP Systems, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mountain Wireless Construction 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Alb Electrice Service Center 257 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ingram Professional Services Inc. 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE DKD Electric LLC 257 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yearout Mechanical, LLC 256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Four Corners Power Plant 363 FTE
CITY-NEAR Four Corners 325 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riley Industrial Services, Inc. - 4 Corners 24 FTE
NAT-TCR Philips Lighting Company 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Solutions : IS - Tech - Plano, TX - Technology Drive 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Border Brokerage Blaine Administration (Wabln) 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR TRW Vehicle Safety Systems-Mesa 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE West Columbia Air Ramp (Sccae) 258 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holland - CN 258 FTE
NAT-SIZE VF Jeanswear 258 FTE
NAT-SIZE JFK Gateway 258 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.