Cellular phone tower construction · Colorado

Mountain Wireless Construction

Aurora, CO · ~61 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mountain Wireless Construction runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cellular phone tower construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Mountain Wireless Construction: 1.7 TCR = 61% of Cellular phone tower construction BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mountain Wireless Construction safety composite

Mountain Wireless Construction scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2016→2024

Mountain Wireless Construction injury rate improved

Mountain Wireless Construction's TCR fell 0.8 from 1.9 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=1.5 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Aurora, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 61% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #26/65
  • PHOTO MP Systems, Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MP Systems, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Mountain Wireless Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mountain Wireless Construction averages 1.7 TCR (61% of the Cellular phone tower construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mountain Wireless Construction TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=1.5 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=1 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Mountain Wireless Construction falls in its industry

1,605 Cellular phone tower construct establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 65 Cellular phone tower construct employers in Colorado.

Mountain Wireless Construction (61 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mountain Wireless Construction
Mountain Wireless Construction (61 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Mountain Wireless Construction has fewer employees than the Cellular phone tower construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2023 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2022 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2019 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2016 1.9 1.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · CO · Aurora

1,605 Cellular phone tower construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 497 employers in Aurora, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MP Systems, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gardner Telecommunications, LLC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR TESSCO Hobbs 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Danella Utility Construction, Inc. 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Yuma Feedlot 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Earth Enterprises Inc dba Waste-Not Recycling - Earth Enterprises Inc dba Waste-Not Recycling 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3020229 - Great Hall Completion 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jordy Construction 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital Colorado 6,663 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Aurora_CO 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Primoris Renewable Energy 1,695 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN5 1,601 FTE
NAT-TCR STR0349 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Village of Palos Park 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Grede - Liberty 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Chr Hansen - Madison 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tinley Park Bickford 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Wall Products LLC 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Woods of Batavia 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookridge Heights 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.