Bottle caps and lids, plastics, manufacturing · Alabama

Aptar CSP Technologies 1000

Name: Aptar CSP Technologies 1000 Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Auburn, AL · ~26 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 2.7
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aptar CSP Technologies 1000 runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Bottle caps and lids, plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Aptar CSP Technologies 1000: 2.7 TCR = 82% of Bottle caps and lids, plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aptar CSP Technologies 1000 safety composite

Aptar CSP Technologies 1000 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2020→2022

Aptar CSP Technologies 1000 injury rate improved

Aptar CSP Technologies 1000's TCR fell 3.8 from 3.8 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=3.8 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Auburn, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 82% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #20/65
PHOTO Roseville Plant
BOOK 3y book
INJ 2 inj
SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Roseville Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.7
Roseville Plan

2.7
MIDWEST MOLDIN

2.7
Currier Plasti

2.7
Anfinsen Plast

2.7

What this shows Aptar CSP Technologies 1000 averages 2.7 TCR (82% of the Bottle caps and lids, plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Aptar CSP Technologies 1000 TCR series: 2020=3.8 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Aptar CSP Technologies 1000 falls in its industry

2,838 Bottle caps and lids, plastics establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 65 Bottle caps and lids, plastics employers in Alabama.

Aptar CSP Technologies 1000 (26 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Aptar CSP Technologies 1000 has fewer employees than the Bottle caps and lids, plastics, manufact median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	Injuries
2022	0.0	0
2021	4.3	1
2020	3.8	1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · AL · Auburn

2,838 Bottle caps and lids, plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 113 employers in Auburn, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Roseville Plant	ROSEVILLE, MI	2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	MIDWEST MOLDING INC	BARTLETT, IL	2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Currier Plastics	AUBURN, NY	2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Anfinsen Plastic Molding, Inc.	OSWEGO, IL	2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Unlimited Contract Services Robertsdale	ROBERTSDALE	26 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Mar-Jac Poultry AL, LLC Hatchery	SPRUCE PINE	26 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Ashland Breeder and Broiler Dept	ANNISTON	26 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Sand Mountain Hatchery	ALBERTVILLE	26 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Briggs & Stratton	Auburn	602 FTE
CITY-NEAR	4021-000017263	Auburn	456 FTE
CITY-NEAR	000017263 AUBURN UNIVERSITY DINING	Auburn	432 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WM 356	Auburn	344 FTE
NAT-TCR	Val-co New Holland	New Holland, PA	2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	2904-SAS-MA	Any, MA	2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	IIMAK (International Imaging Materials, Inc.)	Amherst, NY	2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Eastman Performance Films-Patriot Centre	Martinsville, VA	2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Main Office	Tecumseh, OK	26 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Fastdecks, Inc.	Walled Lake, MI	26 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Wang Globalnet-SF	Hayward, CA	26 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Tecta Portland	Billerica, MA	26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.