Engines, internal combustion (except aircraft, nondiesel automotive), manufacturing · Alabama

Briggs & Stratton

Auburn, AL · ~602 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Briggs & Stratton runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Engines, internal combustion (except aircraft, nondiesel automotive), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Briggs & Stratton: 1.9 TCR = 57% of Engines, internal combustion (except aircraft, nondiesel automotive), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Briggs & Stratton safety composite

Briggs & Stratton scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2016→2024

Briggs & Stratton injury rate improved

Briggs & Stratton's TCR fell 5.0 from 5.2 in 2016 to 0.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.2 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=2.0 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333618 · Auburn, AL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 57% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK P69
  • PHOTO Deutz Corporation-Se…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 77 inj
  • SIZE ~602 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Deutz Corporation-Sequence Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Briggs & Stratton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Briggs & Stratton averages 1.9 TCR (57% of the Engines, internal combustion (except aircraft, nondiesel automotive), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Briggs & Stratton TCR series: 2016=5.2 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=2 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Briggs & Stratton falls in its industry

133 Engines, internal combustion ( establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Briggs & Stratton (602 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 321 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Briggs & Stratton
Briggs & Stratton (602 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 321 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Briggs & Stratton has more employees than the Engines, internal combustion (except air median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2023 0.8 0.1 6 0 0
2022 0.8 0.4 6 0 0
2021 3.6 2.4 16 5 0
2020 1.5 0.8 6 0 0
2019 1.2 0.8 6 0 0
2018 2.0 1.7 8 1 0
2017 1.8 0.5 7 1 0
2016 5.2 3.3 21 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333618 · AL · Auburn

133 Engines, internal combustion (except aircraft, nondiesel automotive), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 113 employers in Auburn, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Deutz Corporation-Sequence Center 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pure Watercraft, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gas Power Systems : Waukesha, WI, USA 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Detroit Diesel Corporation 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE BIRMINGHAM CENTER (ALBIR) 602 FTE
STATE-SIZE LG Electronics Alabama Inc 608 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brett/Robinson Gulf Corporation 595 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arlington Properties, Inc. 610 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4021-000017263 456 FTE
CITY-NEAR 000017263 AUBURN UNIVERSITY DINING 432 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 356 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR Auburn, AL 334 FTE
NAT-TCR OG&E-West Service Center 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR US Engineering Service 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 163511-New Milford | CT | 163511 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Leprino Foods Company 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Saint Clairsville Jobsites 602 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rittal North America LLC 602 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reyes Coca Cola Bottling 602 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lebanon Community Hospital 602 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.