Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Georgia

Arbor Management Services, LLC

Atlanta, GA · ~66 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arbor Management Services, LLC runs at 179% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Arbor Management Services, LLC: 6.8 TCR = 179% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arbor Management Services, LLC safety composite

Arbor Management Services, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Arbor Management Services, LLC: 2.4 → 11.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 11.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Arbor Management Services, LLC's TCR rose 8.8 from 2.4 in 2022 to 11.2 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Atlanta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.8 · 179% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #41/77
  • PHOTO REDBUD PLACE
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: REDBUD PLACE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Arbor Management Services, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arbor Management Services, LLC averages 6.8 TCR (179% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arbor Management Services, LLC TCR series: 2022=2.4 · 2023=11.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Arbor Management Services, LLC falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 77 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Georgia.

Arbor Management Services, LLC (66 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Arbor Management Services, LLC
Arbor Management Services, LLC (66 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Arbor Management Services, LLC has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 11.2 0.0 5 0 0
2022 2.4 2.4 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · GA · Atlanta

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR REDBUD PLACE 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Magnolia Trace 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Salina Presbyterian Manor 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR VOANS Senior Community Care of Michigan, Inc. 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jefferson District - Jackson EMC 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Rivers Energy 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jefferson District Jackson EMC 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oakley Ind Operating 7365 Oakley Industrial Blvd Union City 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Melbourne Same-Day Surgery 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kycovi-Zp0-Nky Covington 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fabrication Associates Inc 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Logan County Health Services 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pepsi-Cola of Great Falls 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ohman Family Living at Blossom 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE St Paul Plumbing and Heating Co 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE MDS Mfg. Co., Inc. 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.