Continuing care retirement communities · Florida

Arbor Oaks at Lakeland Hills

Lakeland, FL · ~62 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arbor Oaks at Lakeland Hills runs at 131% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

Arbor Oaks at Lakeland Hills: 5.0 TCR = 131% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arbor Oaks at Lakeland Hills safety composite

Arbor Oaks at Lakeland Hills scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Arbor Oaks at Lakeland Hills held a steady TCR band

Arbor Oaks at Lakeland Hills's TCR held near 0.3 from 4.5 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.5 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=8.3 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Lakeland, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 131% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #71/283
  • PHOTO Lantern Hill
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lantern Hill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Arbor Oaks at Lakeland Hills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arbor Oaks at Lakeland Hills averages 5.0 TCR (131% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arbor Oaks at Lakeland Hills TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=8.3 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=4.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Arbor Oaks at Lakeland Hills falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #71 safest of 283 Continuing care retirement com employers in Florida.

Arbor Oaks at Lakeland Hills (62 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Arbor Oaks at Lakeland Hills
Arbor Oaks at Lakeland Hills (62 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Arbor Oaks at Lakeland Hills has fewer employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2022 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2019 8.3 6.2 4 0 0
2018 4.1 0.0 2 0 0
2017 6.8 2.3 3 0 0
2016 4.5 2.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · FL · Lakeland

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 426 employers in Lakeland, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lantern Hill 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milestone Senior Living-Hillsboro 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR BIG SPRINGS PLACE 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PHS - SummerWood of Plymouth 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm 88 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE SCS Southern Customer Service 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walsingham Complex 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stuart Service Center 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeland Regional Medical Center 5,518 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeland Distribution 2,927 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clinic 1,651 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - KLAL 1,210 FTE
NAT-TCR Stone Installation and Maintenance, Inc. 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR UVA Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Midwest Block - Jefb 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 102589 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mishawaka Sheet Metal 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Excalibur 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carter Concrete Structures 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE EDEP 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.