Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · Indiana

Mishawaka Sheet Metal

Elkhart, IN · ~62 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mishawaka Sheet Metal runs at 315% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Mishawaka Sheet Metal: 10.4 TCR = 315% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mishawaka Sheet Metal safety composite

Mishawaka Sheet Metal scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2023

Mishawaka Sheet Metal injury rate improved

Mishawaka Sheet Metal's TCR fell 2.0 from 10.9 in 2016 to 9.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 16.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.9 · 2017=11.8 · 2018=16.2 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=11.9 · 2021=6.6 · 2022=11.0 · 2023=9.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Elkhart, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.4 · 315% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #33/35
  • PHOTO Aero Heating & Venti…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 59 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aero Heating & Ventilating (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Mishawaka Sheet Metal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mishawaka Sheet Metal averages 10.4 TCR (315% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mishawaka Sheet Metal TCR series: 2016=10.9 · 2017=11.8 · 2018=16.2 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=11.9 · 2021=6.6 · 2022=11 · 2023=9 · BLS 3.3

Where Mishawaka Sheet Metal falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 35 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in Indiana.

Mishawaka Sheet Metal (62 employees, TCR 10.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mishawaka Sheet Metal
Mishawaka Sheet Metal (62 employees, TCR 10.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Mishawaka Sheet Metal has more employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 9.0 0.0 2 0 0
2022 11.0 9.2 6 0 0
2021 6.6 3.3 4 0 0
2020 11.9 5.9 6 0 0
2019 5.7 5.7 4 0 0
2018 16.2 11.1 16 0 0
2017 11.8 10.6 10 0 0
2016 10.9 6.0 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · IN · Elkhart

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 401 employers in Elkhart, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aero Heating & Ventilating 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ontario Mechanical LLC 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Metal Works, LLC 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant 11B HV- Lake Air 10.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corteva Windfall 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE TCCo-IND 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction Solutions Group 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE James H Drew Corporation - Indiana 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Forest River, Inc. 12,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR THOR MOTOR COACH 2,437 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elkhart Community Schools 1,892 FTE
CITY-NEAR HRV LLC 1,692 FTE
NAT-TCR HMA Paving Harrisburg Area 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Allen and Allen-CU 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Super Stop & Shop 0558 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 2582 10.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Excalibur 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arbor Oaks at Lakeland Hills 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carter Concrete Structures 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE EDEP 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.