Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Arbor Oaks Terrace Memory Care

Newberg, OR · ~55 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arbor Oaks Terrace Memory Care runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Arbor Oaks Terrace Memory Care: 3.4 TCR = 89% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arbor Oaks Terrace Memory Care safety composite

Arbor Oaks Terrace Memory Care scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Arbor Oaks Terrace Memory Care held a steady TCR band

Arbor Oaks Terrace Memory Care's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 148.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=4.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=148.4 · 2020=13.4 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Newberg, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 89% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #25/218
  • PHOTO The Inn at Library Way
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Inn at Library Way (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Arbor Oaks Terrace Memory Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arbor Oaks Terrace Memory Care averages 3.4 TCR (89% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arbor Oaks Terrace Memory Care TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4 · 2018=0 · 2019=148.4 · 2020=13.4 · 2021=3 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Arbor Oaks Terrace Memory Care falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Arbor Oaks Terrace Memory Care (55 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Arbor Oaks Terrace Memory Care
Arbor Oaks Terrace Memory Care (55 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Arbor Oaks Terrace Memory Care has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 13.4 6.7 0 4 0
2019 148.4 148.4 4 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Newberg

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 49 employers in Newberg, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Inn at Library Way 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oak Pointe of Kearney 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Canterbury Village 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Collin Oaks 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Roseburg Resources OR 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE B&G Logging & Construction 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Babb Construction Co dba Delta Construction Co 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Siegmund Excavation & Construction / Allied Rock 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR A-dec, Inc. 1,071 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR363 PROVIDENCE NEWBERG MEDICAL CTR-NEWBERG H 553 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000570 498 FTE
CITY-NEAR 701-00220 334 FTE
NAT-TCR Skwi02-Sk-Sk - Darlington 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR SuperMax Vega Baja 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 2904-ASM-CO 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Accurex OK 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE HG183 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waring Products 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plainview 20433 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rock Island Island County Public Health Department 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.