Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Missouri

Oak Pointe of Kearney

Kearney, MO · ~37 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oak Pointe of Kearney runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Oak Pointe of Kearney: 3.4 TCR = 89% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oak Pointe of Kearney safety composite

Oak Pointe of Kearney scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.9

2017→2022

Oak Pointe of Kearney injury rate improved

Oak Pointe of Kearney's TCR fell 10.9 from 10.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Kearney, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 89% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #35/106
  • PHOTO The Inn at Library Way
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Inn at Library Way (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Oak Pointe of Kearney in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oak Pointe of Kearney averages 3.4 TCR (89% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oak Pointe of Kearney TCR series: 2017=10.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Oak Pointe of Kearney falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 106 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Missouri.

Oak Pointe of Kearney (37 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oak Pointe of Kearney
Oak Pointe of Kearney (37 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Oak Pointe of Kearney has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 9.4 9.4 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 10.9 10.9 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MO · Kearney

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 13 employers in Kearney, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Inn at Library Way 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arbor Oaks Terrace Memory Care 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Canterbury Village 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Collin Oaks 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Substations West 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Dorsett 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Geraldine 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Geraldine District 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Variform Kearney Plant 184 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kearney 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mr. Dell's Foods, LLC 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Platte-Clay Electric Co-op 73 FTE
NAT-TCR Millcraft Cleveland 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Stroudsburg Construction 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 4765-DFWCC1639 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Css Chs Lincoln 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lewis Seed Farms, Inc. - Ursa 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bullet Rental Sales Inc 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4765-SLCCX0DHL 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE SNL Distribution Services Corp-Lakeland 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.