Skilled nursing facilities · Ohio

Arbors at Pomeroy

Pomeroy, OH · ~73 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arbors at Pomeroy runs at 277% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Arbors at Pomeroy: 18.0 TCR = 277% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arbors at Pomeroy safety composite

Arbors at Pomeroy scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.9

2016→2024

Arbors at Pomeroy injury rate improved

Arbors at Pomeroy's TCR fell 10.9 from 18.8 in 2016 to 8.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 78.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=18.8 · 2017=12.1 · 2018=12.0 · 2019=19.3 · 2020=23.2 · 2021=78.5 · 2022=44.0 · 2023=6.5 · 2024=8.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Pomeroy, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.0 · 277% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #990/1074
  • PHOTO Chaplinwood Health a…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chaplinwood Health and Rehabilitation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Arbors at Pomeroy in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arbors at Pomeroy averages 18.0 TCR (277% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arbors at Pomeroy TCR series: 2016=18.8 · 2017=12.1 · 2018=12 · 2019=19.3 · 2020=23.2 · 2021=78.5 · 2022=44 · 2023=6.5 · 2024=8 · BLS 6.5

Where Arbors at Pomeroy falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #990 safest of 1074 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Ohio.

Arbors at Pomeroy (73 employees, TCR 18.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Arbors at Pomeroy
Arbors at Pomeroy (73 employees, TCR 18.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Arbors at Pomeroy has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.0 6.0 4 0 0
2023 6.5 6.5 3 0 0
2022 44.0 44.0 1 19 0
2021 78.5 78.5 5 32 0
2020 23.2 23.2 2 10 0
2019 19.3 11.6 10 0 0
2018 12.0 9.0 8 0 0
2017 12.1 2.7 2 7 0
2016 18.8 18.8 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · OH · Pomeroy

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 5 employers in Pomeroy, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chaplinwood Health and Rehabilitation 18.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Colonial Manor 18.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glenmary Evergreen 18.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Camilla Hall Nursing Home 18.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE A. Brown & Sons Nursery, Inc. 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bay Shore 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE 971-NiSource-Toledo OH-Op Ctr Manhattan Blv 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greater Dayton Construction LTD 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holzer Meigs Emergency Room 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR PDK Construction 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pomeroy Svc Bldg 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pomeroy Service Building 23 FTE
NAT-TCR Chaplinwood Health and Rehabilitation 18.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Box Delivery LLC 18.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Oakmont 18.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Dessie Scott Children's Home 18.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Great Southern Wood - Muscle Shoals 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Great Southern Wood - Conyers 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Azria Health Clarinda 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fareway Stores, Inc. 995 Pella 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.