Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Ohio

Bickford of Lancaster

Lancaster, OH · ~73 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bickford of Lancaster runs at 469% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Bickford of Lancaster: 17.8 TCR = 469% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bickford of Lancaster safety composite

Bickford of Lancaster scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 9% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

7/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bickford of Lancaster: 18.9 → 20.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 71.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.78× in 2021

Bickford of Lancaster's TCR rose 1.1 from 18.9 in 2016 to 20.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 71.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Lancaster, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.8 · 469% of ind

  • DART 14.0 DART
  • RANK #225/234
  • PHOTO Bickford of Sioux Ci…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bickford of Sioux City I (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Bickford of Lancaster in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bickford of Lancaster averages 17.8 TCR (469% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bickford of Lancaster TCR series: 2016=18.9 · 2018=27.9 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=71.6 · 2021=20 · BLS 3.8

Where Bickford of Lancaster falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #225 safest of 234 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Ohio.

Bickford of Lancaster (73 employees, TCR 17.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bickford of Lancaster
Bickford of Lancaster (73 employees, TCR 17.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Bickford of Lancaster has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 20.0 14.0 3 7 0
2020 71.6 68.7 0 25 1
2019 4.5 2.3 2 0 0
2018 27.9 27.9 12 0 0
2016 18.9 16.5 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · OH · Lancaster

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 96 employers in Lancaster, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bickford of Sioux City I 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR American House - Jenison 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Addison of Pleasant Prairie 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bell Tower Retirement Community 17.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE A. Brown & Sons Nursery, Inc. 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bay Shore 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE 971-NiSource-Toledo OH-Op Ctr Manhattan Blv 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greater Dayton Construction LTD 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairfield Medical Center 2,049 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anchor Hocking Plant 1 701 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anchor Hocking 688 FTE
CITY-NEAR Treehouse Foods, Lancaster OH 329 FTE
NAT-TCR Bickford of Sioux City I 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR LAS - Ground Ops 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Emerald Meadows 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 4186-DC208 17.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nova Infusion 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Senior Life Washington, Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Community Coffee - Port Allen Plant 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE SSA FSS CalWorks South Region 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.