Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Nevada

Arbors Memory Care Community

Sparks, NV · ~46 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arbors Memory Care Community runs at 326% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Arbors Memory Care Community: 12.4 TCR = 326% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arbors Memory Care Community safety composite

Arbors Memory Care Community scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Arbors Memory Care Community: 11.5 → 13.3 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 13.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.07× in 2017

Arbors Memory Care Community's TCR rose 1.8 from 11.5 in 2016 to 13.3 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 1.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Sparks, NV ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.4 · 326% of ind

  • DART 13.3 DART
  • RANK #46/52
  • PHOTO Sonata Coconut Creek
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sonata Coconut Creek (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nevada employers → · Look up another →

Arbors Memory Care Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arbors Memory Care Community averages 12.4 TCR (326% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arbors Memory Care Community TCR series: 2016=11.5 · 2017=13.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Arbors Memory Care Community falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nevada alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 52 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Nevada.

Arbors Memory Care Community (46 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Arbors Memory Care Community
Arbors Memory Care Community (46 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Arbors Memory Care Community has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 13.3 13.3 6 0 0
2016 11.5 6.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NV · Sparks

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,574 rated employers in Nevada with headcount on file · 321 employers in Sparks, NV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sonata Coconut Creek 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PAR LLC dba: CherryWood Village 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highland Crossing 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR VIA ELEGANTE 12.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rafael Building Trades 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Envise Southwest 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northwest Confections Nevada, LLC 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metl-Span North Las Vegas 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-NV-Sparks-1-Electric Ave 7,992 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue 7,272 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue-Gigafactory 2,822 FTE
CITY-NEAR NVRNO - RENO HUB 1,324 FTE
NAT-TCR Pottstown (Pasto) 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Poplar Bluff (Three Rivers) (Mothr) 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Riverside Resources, Inc. Admininstrative, ADP, Sheltered Workshop 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Iga #21 12.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Paul Jackson and Son, Inc. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE TR Construction 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Waters of Minocqua 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holiday Inn Express and Suites Madison - Verona 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.