Motor Vehicle Transmission and Powertrain Parts Manufacturing · Nevada

NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue-Gigafactory

Sparks, NV · ~2,822 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue-Gigafactory runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Motor Vehicle Transmission and Powertrain Parts Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue-Gigafactory: 3.6 TCR = 67% of Motor Vehicle Transmission and Powertrain Parts Manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue-Gigafactory safety composite

NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue-Gigafactory scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2018

NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue-Gigafactory injury rate improved

NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue-Gigafactory's TCR fell 1.7 from 5.4 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.4 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.4 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336350 · Sparks, NV AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 3.6 · 67% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK P36
  • PHOTO Danville Machining
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 309 inj
  • SIZE ~2,822 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Danville Machining (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nevada employers → · Look up another →

NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue-Gigafactory in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue-Gigafactory averages 3.6 TCR (67% of the Motor Vehicle Transmission and Powertrain Parts Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue-Gigafactory TCR series: 2016=5.4 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=3.7 · BLS 5.4

Where NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue-Gigafactory falls in its industry

320 Motor Vehicle Transmission and establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue-Gigafactory (2,822 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue-Gigafactory
NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue-Gigafactory (2,822 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9

NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue-Gigafactory has more employees than the Motor Vehicle Transmission and Powertrai median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.7 1.1 249 24 0
2017 1.8 1.0 38 2 0
2016 5.4 4.1 22 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336350 · NV · Sparks

320 Motor Vehicle Transmission and Powertrain Parts Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,574 rated employers in Nevada with headcount on file · 321 employers in Sparks, NV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Danville Machining 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR John Deere Coffeyville Works 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR GHSP 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trailer Axle Assembly 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6403-64030521 2,843 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gaughan South LLC dba South Point Hotel & Casino 2,901 FTE
STATE-SIZE MGM Resorts Operations 2,902 FTE
STATE-SIZE LASPW9622 LAS - NARROW BODY PAX RAMP 3,004 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-NV-Sparks-1-Electric Ave 7,992 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue 7,272 FTE
CITY-NEAR NVRNO - RENO HUB 1,324 FTE
CITY-NEAR RENO HUB (NVRNO) 1,236 FTE
NAT-TCR Max Construction 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HCNE 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Omnium - St. Joseph, MO 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR City of St Clair Shores City Hall 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Saint Francis Medical Center 2,822 FTE
NAT-SIZE Danbury Hospital Inc. 2,822 FTE
NAT-SIZE 50001 Central Support 2,822 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allan Industries, Inc. 2,822 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.