Continuing care retirement communities · Pennsylvania

Arbutus Park Retirement Community

Johnstown, PA · ~245 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arbutus Park Retirement Community runs at 122% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

Arbutus Park Retirement Community: 4.6 TCR = 122% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arbutus Park Retirement Community safety composite

Arbutus Park Retirement Community scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2024

Arbutus Park Retirement Community injury rate improved

Arbutus Park Retirement Community's TCR fell 1.2 from 4.5 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.5 · 2018=6.0 · 2019=9.5 · 2020=3.7 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Johnstown, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 122% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #55/257
  • PHOTO LIFE Lancaster
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 71 inj
  • SIZE ~245 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LIFE Lancaster (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Arbutus Park Retirement Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arbutus Park Retirement Community averages 4.6 TCR (122% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arbutus Park Retirement Community TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2018=6 · 2019=9.5 · 2020=3.7 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Arbutus Park Retirement Community falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #55 safest of 257 Continuing care retirement com employers in Pennsylvania.

Arbutus Park Retirement Community (245 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Arbutus Park Retirement Community
Arbutus Park Retirement Community (245 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Arbutus Park Retirement Community has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 3.3 4 2 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.5 5.5 10 0 0
2020 3.7 3.2 8 0 0
2019 9.5 8.2 23 0 0
2018 6.0 4.8 14 0 0
2016 4.5 3.4 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Johnstown

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 129 employers in Johnstown, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LIFE Lancaster 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Linden Village 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belmont Village Glenview 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Pines Retirement 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Pennsylvania - Birdsboro 245 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-State Envelope Corporation 245 FTE
STATE-SIZE FV-Oliver Healthcare Packaging 245 FTE
STATE-SIZE Building 4 245 FTE
CITY-NEAR Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center 2,955 FTE
CITY-NEAR DLP CONEMAUGH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER LLC 2,243 FTE
CITY-NEAR DLP CONEMAUGH PHYSICIAN PRACTICES LLC 591 FTE
CITY-NEAR Conemaugh Physicians Practices 534 FTE
NAT-TCR Manchester Service Center 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Junge of Cedar Rapids 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bec-Don, Inc 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Rock Ga 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE River Road 245 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maysteel Industries LLC 245 FTE
NAT-SIZE Backroads Utah, Inc. 245 FTE
NAT-SIZE OSI Optoelectronics 245 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.