Commercial printing (except screen, books) · Pennsylvania

FV-Oliver Healthcare Packaging

Feasterville, PA · ~245 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

FV-Oliver Healthcare Packaging runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Commercial printing (except screen, books) workplace, earning a grade C.

FV-Oliver Healthcare Packaging: 2.8 TCR = 85% of Commercial printing (except screen, books) BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

FV-Oliver Healthcare Packaging safety composite

FV-Oliver Healthcare Packaging scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

FV-Oliver Healthcare Packaging: 0.0 → 4.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.42× in 2024

FV-Oliver Healthcare Packaging's TCR rose 4.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Feasterville, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 85% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #50/110
  • PHOTO ABS Graphics, Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~245 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ABS Graphics, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

FV-Oliver Healthcare Packaging in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows FV-Oliver Healthcare Packaging averages 2.8 TCR (85% of the Commercial printing (except screen, books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

FV-Oliver Healthcare Packaging TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=2 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=4 · BLS 3.3

Where FV-Oliver Healthcare Packaging falls in its industry

2,001 Commercial printing (except sc establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #50 safest of 110 Commercial printing (except sc employers in Pennsylvania.

FV-Oliver Healthcare Packaging (245 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate FV-Oliver Healthcare Packaging
FV-Oliver Healthcare Packaging (245 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

FV-Oliver Healthcare Packaging has more employees than the Commercial printing (except screen, book median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 4.0 10 0 0
2023 1.8 1.4 5 0 0
2022 4.8 4.8 10 0 0
2021 4.3 4.3 6 3 0
2020 2.0 1.5 4 0 0
2019 2.9 0.9 6 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · PA · Feasterville

2,001 Commercial printing (except screen, books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 15 employers in Feasterville, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ABS Graphics, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR WCP Westerville 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 26-MT 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Optima Graphics - 0196 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Pennsylvania - Birdsboro 245 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-State Envelope Corporation 245 FTE
STATE-SIZE Building 4 245 FTE
STATE-SIZE Printfly Corporation Headquarters 245 FTE
CITY-NEAR 106541 192 FTE
CITY-NEAR GIANT FOOD STORES 6541 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR GIANT FOOD STORE 6502 FEASTERVILLE 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berger building Products 70 FTE
NAT-TCR Coldkeepers W1 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR WCP Westerville 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 1039 - Niles 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Charlotte Division 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Richemont North America, Inc. 245 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grace Industries LLC 245 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raycap, Inc. 245 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sharp Packaging by Pregis 245 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.