Social service centers, multipurpose · Minnesota

Arc Greater Twin Cities Bloomington

Bloomington, MN · ~36 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arc Greater Twin Cities Bloomington runs at 230% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Social service centers, multipurpose workplace, earning a grade F.

Arc Greater Twin Cities Bloomington: 8.7 TCR = 230% of Social service centers, multipurpose BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arc Greater Twin Cities Bloomington safety composite

Arc Greater Twin Cities Bloomington scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2016→2021

Arc Greater Twin Cities Bloomington injury rate improved

Arc Greater Twin Cities Bloomington's TCR fell 5.4 from 14.3 in 2016 to 8.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 29.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.3 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=29.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=8.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · Bloomington, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.7 · 230% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #56/79
  • PHOTO Wayne County Service…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wayne County Services-Chase (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Arc Greater Twin Cities Bloomington in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arc Greater Twin Cities Bloomington averages 8.7 TCR (230% of the Social service centers, multipurpose BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arc Greater Twin Cities Bloomington TCR series: 2016=14.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=29.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=8.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Arc Greater Twin Cities Bloomington falls in its industry

990 Social service centers, multip establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 79 Social service centers, multip employers in Minnesota.

Arc Greater Twin Cities Bloomington (36 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Arc Greater Twin Cities Bloomington
Arc Greater Twin Cities Bloomington (36 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Arc Greater Twin Cities Bloomington has fewer employees than the Social service centers, multipurpose median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 8.9 0.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 29.2 29.2 6 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 14.3 7.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · MN · Bloomington

990 Social service centers, multipurpose employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 306 employers in Bloomington, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wayne County Services-Chase 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Willmar Main Office 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Circle City ABA 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gateway Community Action - Vanceburg HS 8.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Prairie Moon Nursery 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience - Olivia MN R&D 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Counties Cooperative Litchfield 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2011-Stanton, MN (Monsanto Co.) 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0081 BLOOMINGTON 8170 BLDG 2,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR HP - 8170 2,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bloomington/Normandale 1,474 FTE
CITY-NEAR Donaldson Company Inc. 1,390 FTE
NAT-TCR Fireclay Tile 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Kailua Wastewater Treatment Plant 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Wisconsin - Green Bay Admin Yard 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilkes Elementary 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE HDS-Wilmington 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4769-847-Williams Sonoma 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Windsor Senior Living 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4769-680-Williams Sonoma 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.