Apartment managers' offices · Minnesota

Good Samaritan Society - Heritage Grove

East Grand Forks, MN · ~36 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
25.4
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Good Samaritan Society - Heritage Grove runs at 1811% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Apartment managers' offices workplace, earning a grade F.

Good Samaritan Society - Heritage Grove: 25.4 TCR = 1811% of Apartment managers' offices BLS 1.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Good Samaritan Society - Heritage Grove safety composite

Good Samaritan Society - Heritage Grove scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 25.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−20.9

2019→2020

Good Samaritan Society - Heritage Grove injury rate improved

Good Samaritan Society - Heritage Grove's TCR fell 20.9 from 35.8 in 2019 to 14.9 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 35.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=35.8 · 2020=14.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531311 · East Grand Forks, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 25.4 · 1811% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #26/26
  • PHOTO THE PARKCHESTER NORT…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: THE PARKCHESTER NORTH CONDOMINIUM (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Good Samaritan Society - Heritage Grove in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Good Samaritan Society - Heritage Grove averages 25.4 TCR (1811% of the Apartment managers' offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Good Samaritan Society - Heritage Grove TCR series: 2019=35.8 · 2020=14.9 · BLS 1.4

Where Good Samaritan Society - Heritage Grove falls in its industry

500 Apartment managers' offices establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 26 Apartment managers' offices employers in Minnesota.

Good Samaritan Society - Heritage Grove (36 employees, TCR 25.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Good Samaritan Society - Heritage Grove
Good Samaritan Society - Heritage Grove (36 employees, TCR 25.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Good Samaritan Society - Heritage Grove has fewer employees than the Apartment managers' offices median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 14.9 5.0 2 1 0
2019 35.8 0.0 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531311 · MN · East Grand Forks

500 Apartment managers' offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 18 employers in East Grand Forks, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR THE PARKCHESTER NORTH CONDOMINIUM 25.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CMC Middletown LLC 23.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR C-R Management Co 22.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Lakes Management The Glenn Minnetonka 21.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Prairie Moon Nursery 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience - Olivia MN R&D 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Counties Cooperative Litchfield 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2011-Stanton, MN (Monsanto Co.) 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY EAST GRAND FORKS 406 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISD #595 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR R. J. Zavoral & Sons, Inc. 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hugo's #5 126 FTE
NAT-TCR CAN054 25.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZTRL 25.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Roofing Company Inc 25.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0463 25.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eugene IS/NFF 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE M&M - Staples Operations 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE MaineGeneral Community Care - Skowhegan 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crown Beverage Packaging, LLC - Omaha Plant 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.