Self-help organizations (except for disabled persons, the elderly, persons diagnosed with intellectual and devel · Minnesota

Arc Twin Cities New Hope

New Hope, MN · ~35 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arc Twin Cities New Hope runs at 356% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Self-help organizations (except for disabled persons, the elderly, persons diagnosed with intellectual and devel workplace, earning a grade F.

Arc Twin Cities New Hope: 13.5 TCR = 356% of Self-help organizations (except for disabled persons, the elderly, persons diagnosed with intellectual and devel BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arc Twin Cities New Hope safety composite

Arc Twin Cities New Hope scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Arc Twin Cities New Hope: 5.5 → 9.2 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 24.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.68× in 2021

Arc Twin Cities New Hope's TCR rose 3.8 from 5.5 in 2016 to 9.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 24.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · New Hope, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.5 · 356% of ind

  • DART 9.2 DART
  • RANK #70/79
  • PHOTO 90-39 189th Street
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 90-39 189th Street (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Arc Twin Cities New Hope in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arc Twin Cities New Hope averages 13.5 TCR (356% of the Self-help organizations (except for disabled persons, the elderly, persons diagnosed with intellectual and devel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arc Twin Cities New Hope TCR series: 2016=5.5 · 2017=24 · 2018=12.6 · 2019=20.7 · 2020=9.1 · 2021=9.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Arc Twin Cities New Hope falls in its industry

990 Self-help organizations (excep establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #70 safest of 79 Self-help organizations (excep employers in Minnesota.

Arc Twin Cities New Hope (35 employees, TCR 13.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Arc Twin Cities New Hope
Arc Twin Cities New Hope (35 employees, TCR 13.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Arc Twin Cities New Hope has fewer employees than the Self-help organizations (except for disa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 9.2 9.2 2 0 0
2020 9.1 4.6 2 0 0
2019 20.7 16.6 5 0 0
2018 12.6 4.2 3 0 0
2017 24.0 12.0 5 1 0
2016 5.5 5.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · MN · New Hope

990 Self-help organizations (except for disabled persons, the elderly, persons diagnosed with intellectual and devel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 95 employers in New Hope, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 90-39 189th Street 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park Avenue 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ruth Benner Center 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillside 13.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dollymount 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scotch Prairie Farms LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genex Farm Systems Melrose 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Black Dog Power Plant 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Therese of New Hope 391 FTE
CITY-NEAR Horwitz, Inc 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Hope - Main Store 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Education Center 237 FTE
NAT-TCR Indianapolis Museum of Art d/b/a Newfields 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SunnyBrook of Fairfield 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR ZLS - Mishawaka 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR EFWL 13.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Air Mechancial & Service Corp Casselberry 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sand Hills 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Gardens of Waterford Place 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Drury Inn & Suites - St. Louis Airport 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.