Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Alabama

The Gardens of Waterford Place

Montgomery, AL · ~35 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Gardens of Waterford Place runs at 313% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Gardens of Waterford Place: 11.9 TCR = 313% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Gardens of Waterford Place safety composite

The Gardens of Waterford Place scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2018→2021

The Gardens of Waterford Place injury rate improved

The Gardens of Waterford Place's TCR fell 3.9 from 9.7 in 2018 to 5.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 32.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=9.7 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=32.0 · 2021=5.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Montgomery, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.9 · 313% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #50/64
  • PHOTO KRE-BSL HUSKY NASHUA…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KRE-BSL HUSKY NASHUA OPERATION LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

The Gardens of Waterford Place in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Gardens of Waterford Place averages 11.9 TCR (313% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Gardens of Waterford Place TCR series: 2018=9.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=32 · 2021=5.8 · BLS 3.8

Where The Gardens of Waterford Place falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #50 safest of 64 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Alabama.

The Gardens of Waterford Place (35 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Gardens of Waterford Place
The Gardens of Waterford Place (35 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Gardens of Waterford Place has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 5.8 0.0 1 1 0
2020 32.0 16.0 3 5 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 9.7 4.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AL · Montgomery

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 420 employers in Montgomery, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY NASHUA OPERATION LLC 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Summit Place of Mooresville 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR HP Harbor Properties, LLC 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The HR Technology Companies, Inc. FLWT: Via Elegante, LLC 11.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Western Division Jasper Business Office 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2020 Osha form 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ozark Safety Services, LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newell & Bush, Inc. 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC 3,611 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Medical Center South 2,392 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jackson Hospital & Clinic 2,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Montgomery 1,561 FTE
NAT-TCR Main 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Express - San Antonio Airport 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Snow Summit, LLC 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sanders-Sr Living Community 11.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sand Hills 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manufacturing Solutions of MN - Cottage Grove 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Air Mechancial & Service Corp Casselberry 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arc Twin Cities New Hope 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.