Self-help organizations (except for disabled persons, the elderly, persons diagnosed with intellectual and devel · Minnesota

Arc Twin CIties Program

St Paul, MN · ~44 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arc Twin CIties Program runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Self-help organizations (except for disabled persons, the elderly, persons diagnosed with intellectual and devel workplace, earning a grade C.

Arc Twin CIties Program: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Self-help organizations (except for disabled persons, the elderly, persons diagnosed with intellectual and devel BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arc Twin CIties Program safety composite

Arc Twin CIties Program scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Arc Twin CIties Program held a steady TCR band

Arc Twin CIties Program's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · St Paul, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/79
  • PHOTO The People Concern -…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The People Concern - Alexandria (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Arc Twin CIties Program in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arc Twin CIties Program averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Self-help organizations (except for disabled persons, the elderly, persons diagnosed with intellectual and devel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arc Twin CIties Program TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Arc Twin CIties Program falls in its industry

990 Self-help organizations (excep establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 79 Self-help organizations (excep employers in Minnesota.

Arc Twin CIties Program (44 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Arc Twin CIties Program
Arc Twin CIties Program (44 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Arc Twin CIties Program has fewer employees than the Self-help organizations (except for disa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · MN · St Paul

990 Self-help organizations (except for disabled persons, the elderly, persons diagnosed with intellectual and devel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 230 employers in St Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The People Concern - Alexandria 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LifeStream Services, Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The People Concern - E6 Hollywood 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR YMCA of Memphis - Oxford 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE West River 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monticello Training Ctr-LL 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water Treatment Facility 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE WasteWater Treatment Facility 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1010 REGIONS HOSPITAL 5,313 FTE
CITY-NEAR HPI-Ramsey 5,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Travelers St Paul Office 2,256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marsden Bldg Maintenance 1,800 FTE
NAT-TCR Gap Inc. - Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta - Phipps 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 208 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Splash Events 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Queen City 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE HTI-New Comerstown 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diebold Nixdorf Hoover AL 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.