Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina
Queen City
Charlotte, NC · ~44 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 9.3
- Avg TCR
- 3.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Queen City runs at 245% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.
Queen City: 9.3 TCR = 245% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Queen City safety composite
Queen City scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
56/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- D 9.3 per 100 workers
Safer than 35% of industry peers
- DART rate
- B 0 per 100 workers
Safer than 84% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 50% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
TCR Δ
−7.1
2016→2021
Queen City injury rate improved
Queen City's TCR fell 7.1 from 7.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 23.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2016=7.1 · 2017=5.1 · 2018=14.9 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=23.8 · 2021=0.0
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 623312 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL
Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 245% of ind
- DART 0.0 DART
- RANK #270/356
- PHOTO Oakmont of Escondido…
- BOOK 6y book
- INJ 16 inj
- SIZE ~44 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: Oakmont of Escondido Hills (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →
Queen City in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
Queen City
9.3 TCR
- Oakmont of Esc
Oakmont of Escondido Hills
9.3 TCR
- Good Tree
Good Tree
9.3 TCR
- Merrill Garden
Merrill Gardens
9.3 TCR
- 2248-63160
2248-63160
9.3 TCR
What this shows Queen City averages 9.3 TCR (245% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).
Queen City TCR series: 2016=7.1 · 2017=5.1 · 2018=14.9 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=23.8 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.8
Where Queen City falls in its industry
6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishmentsSafer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.
Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #270 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.
Queen City has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 23.8 | 11.9 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| 2019 | 4.9 | 2.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 14.9 | 8.9 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5.1 | 2.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 7.1 | 4.7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
623312 · NC · Charlotte
6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | Oakmont of Escondido Hills | 9.3 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Good Tree | 9.3 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Merrill Gardens | 9.3 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | 2248-63160 | 9.3 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | Sleepy Creek Farms | 44 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | ALBEMARLE WMSTN | 44 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Morganton | 44 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Aqua Services, Inc. - Cary | 44 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) | 8,444 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | 0001-Carolinas Medical Center | 8,032 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML | 7,295 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center | 4,973 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | VPI Salinas | 9.3 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Dutchland Plastics, LLC | 9.3 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Central Bi Products Long Prairie | 9.3 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | FedEX Office Bay Area Manaufacturing Plant | 9.3 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | HTI-New Comerstown | 44 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Diebold Nixdorf Hoover AL | 44 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Diebold Nixdorf Salt Lake City UT | 44 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Splash Events | 44 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.