Window shades and blinds merchant wholesalers · California

Architectural Window Shades

El Monte, CA · ~35 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Architectural Window Shades runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Window shades and blinds merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Architectural Window Shades: 2.4 TCR = 108% of Window shades and blinds merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Architectural Window Shades safety composite

Architectural Window Shades scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2024

Architectural Window Shades injury rate improved

Architectural Window Shades's TCR fell 2.6 from 2.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=8.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423220 · El Monte, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 108% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/19
  • PHOTO Umbra Buffalo
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Umbra Buffalo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Architectural Window Shades in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Architectural Window Shades averages 2.4 TCR (108% of the Window shades and blinds merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Architectural Window Shades TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=8 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Architectural Window Shades falls in its industry

146 Window shades and blinds merch establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 19 Window shades and blinds merch employers in California.

Architectural Window Shades (35 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Architectural Window Shades
Architectural Window Shades (35 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Architectural Window Shades has fewer employees than the Window shades and blinds merchant wholes median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.5 5.5 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 8.0 5.3 3 0 0
2017 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423220 · CA · El Monte

146 Window shades and blinds merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 71 employers in El Monte, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Umbra Buffalo 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sugar Land Plant 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlanta Flooring Design Centers, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Omega Moulding CA 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION FABRICATION/CARPENTRY/PAINTING/ELECTRIC/PIPE 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meek Ranches LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dresick Farms, Inc. - Farm 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolfsen Inc 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 231 2,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DPS1 1,431 FTE
CITY-NEAR CMS Telstar 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR D Longo, LLC dba Longo Toyota 612 FTE
NAT-TCR Meadows Farms- Chantilly, VA Corp. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR River Metals Recycling - River Road 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 10769 Towson 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Teasdale Latin Foods Inc ( Louisville ) 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gold Medal Logistics 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Connor Logistics, LLC 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE District Kitchen + Cocktails North 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5 Riverbend Dr. Stamford Ct 06907 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.