Aluminum castings (except die-castings), unfinished, manufacturing · Ohio

Arconic B and C Castings (06310)

Barberton, OH · ~34 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arconic B and C Castings (06310) runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aluminum castings (except die-castings), unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Arconic B and C Castings (06310): 2.6 TCR = 78% of Aluminum castings (except die-castings), unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arconic B and C Castings (06310) safety composite

Arconic B and C Castings (06310) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2016→2018

Arconic B and C Castings (06310) injury rate improved

Arconic B and C Castings (06310)'s TCR fell 5.2 from 5.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.2 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331524 · Barberton, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 78% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/31
  • PHOTO Trio Foundry Inc
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Trio Foundry Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Arconic B and C Castings (06310) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arconic B and C Castings (06310) averages 2.6 TCR (78% of the Aluminum castings (except die-castings), unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arconic B and C Castings (06310) TCR series: 2016=5.2 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Arconic B and C Castings (06310) falls in its industry

156 Aluminum castings (except die- establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 31 Aluminum castings (except die- employers in Ohio.

Arconic B and C Castings (06310) (34 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 7.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Arconic B and C Castings (06310)
Arconic B and C Castings (06310) (34 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 7.0

Arconic B and C Castings (06310) has fewer employees than the Aluminum castings (except die-castings), median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2016 5.2 2.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331524 · OH · Barberton

156 Aluminum castings (except die-castings), unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 58 employers in Barberton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Trio Foundry Inc 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ajax X Ray Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Enkei America, Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carson Industries, Inc. 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bauman Orchards Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Millcreek Gardens LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meadow View Growers, Inc 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE ayers farms inc 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barberton Campus 888 FTE
CITY-NEAR BWX Technologies, Inc. Nuclear Operations Group - Barberton 825 FTE
CITY-NEAR BWX Technologies, LLC 737 FTE
CITY-NEAR S.A. Comunale - Norton 612 FTE
NAT-TCR Foss - San Francisco 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Des Moines Two Rivers Gas 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR EOS Fitness - Las Vegas Aliante 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Koko Marina Brewpub 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE TX.HOUST.115 - Ricoh Usa, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ferrera Brothers, LLC, Maspeth Plant 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hebron Preprint 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMEREN SERVICES - Building Services - UE 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.