Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile, gray, malleable, semisteel) · Ohio

Liberty Technology

Delaware, OH · ~34 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Liberty Technology runs at 398% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile, gray, malleable, semisteel) workplace, earning a grade F.

Liberty Technology: 13.1 TCR = 398% of Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile, gray, malleable, semisteel) BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Liberty Technology safety composite

Liberty Technology scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.5

2017→2024

Liberty Technology injury rate improved

Liberty Technology's TCR fell 13.5 from 23.5 in 2017 to 10.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 238.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=23.5 · 2018=238.3 · 2019=24.7 · 2020=9.0 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=10.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331511 · Delaware, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.1 · 398% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #25/31
  • PHOTO Foundry
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 44 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Foundry (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Liberty Technology in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Liberty Technology averages 13.1 TCR (398% of the Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile, gray, malleable, semisteel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Liberty Technology TCR series: 2017=23.5 · 2018=238.3 · 2019=24.7 · 2020=9 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=10 · BLS 3.3

Where Liberty Technology falls in its industry

272 Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 31 Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile employers in Ohio.

Liberty Technology (34 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Liberty Technology
Liberty Technology (34 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Liberty Technology has fewer employees than the Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile, gray, ma median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.0 0.0 2 2 0
2023 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2022 8.8 0.0 3 0 0
2020 9.0 0.0 1 1 0
2019 24.7 8.2 14 1 0
2018 238.3 143.0 13 2 0
2017 23.5 14.1 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331511 · OH · Delaware

272 Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile, gray, malleable, semisteel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 99 employers in Delaware, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Foundry 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northern Iron & Machine - Foundry 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gnutti Carlo USA 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Torraqnce Casting 12.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bauman Orchards Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Millcreek Gardens LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meadow View Growers, Inc 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE ayers farms inc 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR 193-DC001 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grady Memorial Hospital 666 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delaware 432 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advance Auto Parts DC 23 414 FTE
NAT-TCR TCSO South County Detention 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 1056 - Binghamton Vestal 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Euclid Beverage, LLC 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Fayette Janitorial LLC- CTI Wilder 13.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE TechnipFMC - Schilling Robotics (Shingle Springs) 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE LMC Enterprises, DBA Chemco Products Company-Ceres 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Texas Organ Sharing Alliance - Austin 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE 30018 Capstone - Pfs Milton Ga 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.