Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly · Pennsylvania

Arden Courts of Jefferson Hills

Jefferson Hills, PA · ~55 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arden Courts of Jefferson Hills runs at 225% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly workplace, earning a grade F.

Arden Courts of Jefferson Hills: 8.5 TCR = 225% of Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arden Courts of Jefferson Hills safety composite

Arden Courts of Jefferson Hills scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.5

2016→2024

Arden Courts of Jefferson Hills injury rate improved

Arden Courts of Jefferson Hills's TCR fell 13.5 from 18.8 in 2016 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 18.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=18.8 · 2017=7.1 · 2018=7.0 · 2019=9.2 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=2.6 · 2023=10.8 · 2024=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Jefferson Hills, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.5 · 225% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #152/257
  • PHOTO Skyline Ridge Nursin…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Skyline Ridge Nursing Rehabilitation Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Arden Courts of Jefferson Hills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arden Courts of Jefferson Hills averages 8.5 TCR (225% of the Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arden Courts of Jefferson Hills TCR series: 2016=18.8 · 2017=7.1 · 2018=7 · 2019=9.2 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=2.6 · 2023=10.8 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Arden Courts of Jefferson Hills falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted Living Facilities for establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #152 safest of 257 Assisted Living Facilities for employers in Pennsylvania.

Arden Courts of Jefferson Hills (55 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Arden Courts of Jefferson Hills
Arden Courts of Jefferson Hills (55 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Arden Courts of Jefferson Hills has fewer employees than the Assisted Living Facilities for the Elder median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 5.3 2 0 0
2023 10.8 5.4 4 0 0
2021 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2020 7.5 7.5 3 0 0
2019 9.2 0.0 3 1 0
2018 7.0 7.0 3 0 0
2017 7.1 4.7 3 0 0
2016 18.8 9.4 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Jefferson Hills

4,127 Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 11 employers in Jefferson Hills, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Skyline Ridge Nursing Rehabilitation Center 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts of Virginia Beach 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Aspen Wind 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frasier 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Olyphant, PA 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Viridity Energy Solutions Inc. 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stable Hollow Woodworking LLC 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Whistler Construction Company 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kurt J Lesker Company 259 FTE
CITY-NEAR KJLC Building #2 258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Synthomer Jefferson Hills LLC 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR BAW PLASTICS INC 131 FTE
NAT-TCR Howell Mi 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Portage Physician Practices Inc. 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Canada company,LLC 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR EnerStar Electric Cooperative 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Landsberg San Diego 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 456 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 041 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marlin Technologies Inc. 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.