Continuing care retirement communities · Colorado

Skyline Ridge Nursing Rehabilitation Center

Canon City, CO · ~105 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Skyline Ridge Nursing Rehabilitation Center runs at 225% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Skyline Ridge Nursing Rehabilitation Center: 8.5 TCR = 225% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Skyline Ridge Nursing Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Skyline Ridge Nursing Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2019→2024

Skyline Ridge Nursing Rehabilitation Center injury rate improved

Skyline Ridge Nursing Rehabilitation Center's TCR fell 2.8 from 9.9 in 2019 to 7.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=9.9 · 2024=7.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Canon City, CO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.5 · 225% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #43/75
  • PHOTO Arden Courts of Jeff…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~105 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arden Courts of Jefferson Hills (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Skyline Ridge Nursing Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Skyline Ridge Nursing Rehabilitation Center averages 8.5 TCR (225% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Skyline Ridge Nursing Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2019=9.9 · 2024=7.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Skyline Ridge Nursing Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 75 Continuing care retirement com employers in Colorado.

Skyline Ridge Nursing Rehabilitation Center (105 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Skyline Ridge Nursing Rehabilitation Center
Skyline Ridge Nursing Rehabilitation Center (105 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Skyline Ridge Nursing Rehabilitation Center has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.1 3.6 4 0 0
2019 9.9 3.7 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CO · Canon City

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 39 employers in Canon City, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts of Jefferson Hills 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts of Virginia Beach 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Aspen Wind 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frasier 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Claystone Construction Inc 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lightworks Fiber & Consulting, LLC 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Troy Forming Concrete Inc. 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Photon Brothers Inc 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Thomas More Hospital 477 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1019 313 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1019 309 FTE
CITY-NEAR 620-00417 120 FTE
NAT-TCR Portage Physician Practices Inc. 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Canada company,LLC 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Arden Courts of Jefferson Hills 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR EnerStar Electric Cooperative 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Raleigh Oaks Behavioral Health 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Solvay USA LLC 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Capital Printing 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE 66-Usf-Olf Chesapeake Square 105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.