Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly · Pennsylvania

Arden Courts of King of Prussia

King of Prussia, PA · ~50 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arden Courts of King of Prussia runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly workplace, earning a grade D.

Arden Courts of King of Prussia: 6.2 TCR = 163% of Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arden Courts of King of Prussia safety composite

Arden Courts of King of Prussia scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.9

2017→2024

Arden Courts of King of Prussia injury rate improved

Arden Courts of King of Prussia's TCR fell 7.9 from 12.4 in 2017 to 4.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=12.4 · 2018=2.5 · 2022=5.4 · 2024=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · King of Prussia, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 163% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #106/257
  • PHOTO Windsor Run
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Windsor Run (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Arden Courts of King of Prussia in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arden Courts of King of Prussia averages 6.2 TCR (163% of the Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arden Courts of King of Prussia TCR series: 2017=12.4 · 2018=2.5 · 2022=5.4 · 2024=4.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Arden Courts of King of Prussia falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted Living Facilities for establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #106 safest of 257 Assisted Living Facilities for employers in Pennsylvania.

Arden Courts of King of Prussia (50 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Arden Courts of King of Prussia
Arden Courts of King of Prussia (50 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Arden Courts of King of Prussia has fewer employees than the Assisted Living Facilities for the Elder median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.6 2.3 2 0 0
2022 5.4 0.0 2 0 0
2018 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2017 12.4 9.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · King of Prussia

4,127 Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 183 employers in King of Prussia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Windsor Run 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR EB Care at Garden City LLC 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Everlan Johnson City, LLC 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marshalltown Bickford 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE To-Jo Food Products Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kulp Family Dairy LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maronda Homes Inc of Pennsylvania 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Home Remodeling Pros of Central PA 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR 199897 9,243 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Valley Forge (1029) 2,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSL Behring, King of Prussia 1,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DPH2 1,109 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 437 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Plasman Precision Parts LLC 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sterling Rope 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Century Center for Rehabilitation and Healing 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arden Courts of Bingham Farms 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Modern routes 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phoenix Transport 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arden Courts of Tampa 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.