Farm management services · California

Ardzrooni Vineyard Management, LLC

Philo, CA · ~107 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ardzrooni Vineyard Management, LLC runs at 251% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Farm management services workplace, earning a grade F.

Ardzrooni Vineyard Management, LLC: 11.3 TCR = 251% of Farm management services BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ardzrooni Vineyard Management, LLC safety composite

Ardzrooni Vineyard Management, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.0

2017→2023

Ardzrooni Vineyard Management, LLC injury rate improved

Ardzrooni Vineyard Management, LLC's TCR fell 10.0 from 11.2 in 2017 to 1.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 21.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.2 · 2018=14.4 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=21.9 · 2022=18.4 · 2023=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115116 · Philo, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.3 · 251% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #40/46
  • PHOTO GVFS-Yard
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~107 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GVFS-Yard (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Ardzrooni Vineyard Management, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ardzrooni Vineyard Management, LLC averages 11.3 TCR (251% of the Farm management services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ardzrooni Vineyard Management, LLC TCR series: 2017=11.2 · 2018=14.4 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=21.9 · 2022=18.4 · 2023=1.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Ardzrooni Vineyard Management, LLC falls in its industry

75 Farm management services establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #40 safest of 46 Farm management services employers in California.

Ardzrooni Vineyard Management, LLC (107 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Ardzrooni Vineyard Management, LLC
Ardzrooni Vineyard Management, LLC (107 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.7

Ardzrooni Vineyard Management, LLC has more employees than the Farm management services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2022 18.4 14.7 8 12 0
2021 21.9 10.4 11 8 0
2020 8.1 5.8 0 7 0
2019 4.1 2.0 1 3 0
2018 14.4 4.8 9 6 0
2017 11.2 7.8 8 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115116 · CA · Philo

75 Farm management services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 6 employers in Philo, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GVFS-Yard 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dan Drake Enterprises, LLC 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sierra Land and Cattle Co LLC 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sierra Pacific Farms, Inc. 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Munger Bros, LLC 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Growers Transplanting 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fondomonte California LLC - Blythe Ranch 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Coast Tomato Growers, Inc. 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR Roederer Estate 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Husch Vineyards 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR I & E Lath Mill 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Handley Cellars 23 FTE
NAT-TCR Lewis Memorial Christian Village 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kiswel Inc 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Faucets Milwaukee 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR South Shore Health Home Care Division 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Abilene Bone & Joint 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Day Hab Pecora Center 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Astronics LSI NH 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elmwood Gardens 107 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.