Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Ohio

Area Agency on Aging 3

Lima, OH · ~133 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Area Agency on Aging 3 runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Area Agency on Aging 3: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Area Agency on Aging 3 safety composite

Area Agency on Aging 3 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Area Agency on Aging 3 held a steady TCR band

Area Agency on Aging 3's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.0 TCR.

2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Lima, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/40
  • PHOTO Community Interface …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~133 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Community Interface services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Area Agency on Aging 3 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Area Agency on Aging 3 averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Area Agency on Aging 3 TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Area Agency on Aging 3 falls in its industry

1,320 Companion services for disable establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 40 Companion services for disable employers in Ohio.

Area Agency on Aging 3 (133 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Area Agency on Aging 3
Area Agency on Aging 3 (133 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Area Agency on Aging 3 has more employees than the Companion services for disabled persons, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · OH · Lima

1,320 Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 243 employers in Lima, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Community Interface services 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chicago Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR GeoCare, Inc. DBA Home Instead Senior Care 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Changing Lives in The Central Valley, LLC 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Petta Enterprises Cambridge 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Canton 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Progressive Foam Technologies Beach City 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Abbott Electric 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health St Ritas Medical Center 2,540 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Rita's Medical Center 2,531 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Ritas Medical Center 2,445 FTE
CITY-NEAR LIMA ENGINE 1,457 FTE
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1655 3rd St,San Francisco (MB3 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Integration Appliance Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Buffalo Valley Lutheran Village 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seniors' Resource Center 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hiway Credit Union - Empire 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE DMG Paving & Grading Construction 133 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.