Continuing care retirement communities · Pennsylvania

Buffalo Valley Lutheran Village

Lewisburg, PA · ~133 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Buffalo Valley Lutheran Village runs at 433% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Buffalo Valley Lutheran Village: 16.5 TCR = 433% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Buffalo Valley Lutheran Village safety composite

Buffalo Valley Lutheran Village scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Buffalo Valley Lutheran Village: 6.0 → 8.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 44.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.44× in 2023

Buffalo Valley Lutheran Village's TCR rose 2.7 from 6.0 in 2016 to 8.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 44.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Lewisburg, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 16.5 · 433% of ind

  • DART 7.2 DART
  • RANK #236/257
  • PHOTO Wesley Enhanced Livi…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~133 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wesley Enhanced Living Main Line (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Buffalo Valley Lutheran Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Buffalo Valley Lutheran Village averages 16.5 TCR (433% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Buffalo Valley Lutheran Village TCR series: 2016=6 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=44.3 · 2021=39.6 · 2023=8.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Buffalo Valley Lutheran Village falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #236 safest of 257 Continuing care retirement com employers in Pennsylvania.

Buffalo Valley Lutheran Village (133 employees, TCR 16.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Buffalo Valley Lutheran Village
Buffalo Valley Lutheran Village (133 employees, TCR 16.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Buffalo Valley Lutheran Village has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.7 7.2 0 6 0
2021 39.6 34.0 9 26 0
2020 44.3 39.3 4 40 0
2019 5.7 3.8 5 1 0
2018 4.2 4.2 4 0 0
2017 6.8 5.8 7 0 0
2016 6.0 5.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Lewisburg

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 31 employers in Lewisburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wesley Enhanced Living Main Line 16.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morning Pointe of Louisville 16.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bickford of Okemos (Lansing) 16.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Oaks of Englewood 16.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Charter Homes & Neighborhoods 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scenic Ridge Company 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction Masters Services, LLC. 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE FM Browns Sons Inc. Sinking Spring 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR EVANGELICAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 1,869 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1644 388 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1644 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR Albright Care Services - RiverWoods 298 FTE
NAT-TCR 260450-Austin Po 16.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZWHG 16.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Cabak - Bakersfield Center 16.5 TCR
NAT-TCR ABF Freight 158 16.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Seniors' Resource Center 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hiway Credit Union - Empire 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE DMG Paving & Grading Construction 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Les Schwab-Production Center 133 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.