Solid Waste and Recycle Collection · Illinois

Area Disposal Service Inc. Urbana HC

Urbana, IL · ~37 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.2
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Area Disposal Service Inc. Urbana HC runs at 508% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Solid Waste and Recycle Collection workplace, earning a grade F.

Area Disposal Service Inc. Urbana HC: 13.2 TCR = 508% of Solid Waste and Recycle Collection BLS 2.6 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Area Disposal Service Inc. Urbana HC safety composite

Area Disposal Service Inc. Urbana HC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2022→2024

Area Disposal Service Inc. Urbana HC injury rate improved

Area Disposal Service Inc. Urbana HC's TCR fell 4.9 from 14.1 in 2022 to 9.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 16.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=14.1 · 2023=16.3 · 2024=9.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Urbana, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.2 · 508% of ind

  • DART 9.2 DART
  • RANK #131/143
  • PHOTO Conwaste Recogido Sa…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Conwaste Recogido San Juan Zona 1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Area Disposal Service Inc. Urbana HC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Area Disposal Service Inc. Urbana HC averages 13.2 TCR (508% of the Solid Waste and Recycle Collection BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Area Disposal Service Inc. Urbana HC TCR series: 2022=14.1 · 2023=16.3 · 2024=9.2 · BLS 2.6

Where Area Disposal Service Inc. Urbana HC falls in its industry

2,322 Solid Waste and Recycle Collec establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #131 safest of 143 Solid Waste and Recycle Collec employers in Illinois.

Area Disposal Service Inc. Urbana HC (37 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Area Disposal Service Inc. Urbana HC
Area Disposal Service Inc. Urbana HC (37 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Area Disposal Service Inc. Urbana HC has fewer employees than the Solid Waste and Recycle Collection median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.2 9.2 5 0 0
2023 16.3 14.3 8 0 0
2022 14.1 14.1 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · IL · Urbana

2,322 Solid Waste and Recycle Collection employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 95 employers in Urbana, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Conwaste Recogido San Juan Zona 1 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR GFL Solid Waste Midwest LLC-Kingsford HC 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Las Vegas Industrial and Medical waste Division BU470 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Conwaste Recogido Desperdicios Solidos Lares 13.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Curtis Orchard Ltd 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tuscola 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lewis Seed Farms, Inc. - Ursa 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aurora Fleet Facility 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Urbana Campus 23,671 FTE
CITY-NEAR CARLE 18,152 FTE
CITY-NEAR CARLE FOUNDATION HOSPITAL 8,566 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heart of Mary Medical Center 651 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Irvine 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tntre - Trenton 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Minnesota Correctional Facility - Stillwater 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Conwaste Recogido San Juan Zona 1 13.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE C.S. Wo/HomeWorld HNL 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE TRANSPORTATION 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tulsa Winnelson 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Larson House 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.