Correctional institutions · Minnesota

Minnesota Correctional Facility - Stillwater

Bayport, MN · ~460 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.2
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minnesota Correctional Facility - Stillwater runs at 413% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Correctional institutions workplace, earning a grade F.

Minnesota Correctional Facility - Stillwater: 13.2 TCR = 413% of Correctional institutions BLS 3.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minnesota Correctional Facility - Stillwater safety composite

Minnesota Correctional Facility - Stillwater scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Minnesota Correctional Facility - Stillwater: 2.9 → 4.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 46.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.36× in 2024

Minnesota Correctional Facility - Stillwater's TCR rose 1.8 from 2.9 in 2019 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 46.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922140 · Bayport, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.2 · 413% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #25/32
  • PHOTO New Haven Correction…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 66 inj
  • SIZE ~460 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: New Haven Correctional Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Minnesota Correctional Facility - Stillwater in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minnesota Correctional Facility - Stillwater averages 13.2 TCR (413% of the Correctional institutions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minnesota Correctional Facility - Stillwater TCR series: 2019=2.9 · 2020=46 · 2022=7.3 · 2023=5 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 3.2

Where Minnesota Correctional Facility - Stillwater falls in its industry

482 Correctional institutions establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 32 Correctional institutions employers in Minnesota.

Minnesota Correctional Facility - Stillwater (460 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Minnesota Correctional Facility - Stillwater
Minnesota Correctional Facility - Stillwater (460 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Minnesota Correctional Facility - Stillwater has more employees than the Correctional institutions median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 4.7 16 4 0
2023 5.0 4.8 17 3 0
2022 7.3 6.8 9 20 0
2020 46.0 46.0 12 191 0
2019 2.9 2.2 12 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922140 · MN · Bayport

482 Correctional institutions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 12 employers in Bayport, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR New Haven Correctional Center 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastern Oregon Youth Correctional Facility 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR DC-COTA Cadets 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northern Regional CFA Business Office 13.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE LSI - Delano 460 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2352 460 FTE
STATE-SIZE PHS - Johanna Shores 460 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jostens - Broadway 459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bayport Main - CORP 2,823 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Corrections- Stillwater 615 FTE
CITY-NEAR A.S. King Plant 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR King Gen Plant-PD 83 FTE
NAT-TCR Tntre - Trenton 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Irvine 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Area Disposal Service Inc. Urbana HC 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Fayetteville Health and Rehabilitation Center 13.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fairmont Century Plaza 460 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caoar - Oakland Air Hub 460 FTE
NAT-SIZE J&R Schugel Trucking Inc. - OH 460 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flying Food Group EWR 460 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.