Fire and flood restoration, single-family housing, general contractors · Arizona

Arizona Red Mountain Services dba Dry Force

Mesa, AZ · ~32 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arizona Red Mountain Services dba Dry Force runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fire and flood restoration, single-family housing, general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Arizona Red Mountain Services dba Dry Force: 1.1 TCR = 28% of Fire and flood restoration, single-family housing, general contractors BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arizona Red Mountain Services dba Dry Force safety composite

Arizona Red Mountain Services dba Dry Force scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Arizona Red Mountain Services dba Dry Force held a steady TCR band

Arizona Red Mountain Services dba Dry Force's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236118 · Mesa, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/19
  • PHOTO NOVA HOMES OF SOUTH …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NOVA HOMES OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Arizona Red Mountain Services dba Dry Force in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arizona Red Mountain Services dba Dry Force averages 1.1 TCR (28% of the Fire and flood restoration, single-family housing, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arizona Red Mountain Services dba Dry Force TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Arizona Red Mountain Services dba Dry Force falls in its industry

698 Fire and flood restoration, si establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 19 Fire and flood restoration, si employers in Arizona.

Arizona Red Mountain Services dba Dry Force (32 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Arizona Red Mountain Services dba Dry Force
Arizona Red Mountain Services dba Dry Force (32 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Arizona Red Mountain Services dba Dry Force has fewer employees than the Fire and flood restoration, single-famil median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236118 · AZ · Mesa

698 Fire and flood restoration, single-family housing, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 565 employers in Mesa, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NOVA HOMES OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PROYECTO CDBG R3 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mark Mariani Inc. 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE FICO Headquarters 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elgin Tree Farm, Inc. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE PFYF FINISHER & TRANS-EST 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARIZONA FINISHER & TRANS-EST 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZ001 4,193 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZAPW9668 AZA - RAMP PAX 3,181 FTE
CITY-NEAR 04-290370278-2 1,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Police Department H210 1,651 FTE
NAT-TCR Trans-Phos Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Albemarle Corporation - Tyrone Site 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri-State Roofing & Sheet Metal Company of West Virginia 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer Inc 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Inland Service Corporation, LLC 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMP Electrical Services Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Kinney SLO 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Redondo Beach Hotel 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.