Cellular phone tower construction · Arizona

Arizona West Builders and Communications, Inc.

Mesa, AZ · ~23 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arizona West Builders and Communications, Inc. runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cellular phone tower construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Arizona West Builders and Communications, Inc.: 2.6 TCR = 93% of Cellular phone tower construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arizona West Builders and Communications, Inc. safety composite

Arizona West Builders and Communications, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2016→2022

Arizona West Builders and Communications, Inc. injury rate improved

Arizona West Builders and Communications, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.5 from 3.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.5 · 2017=6.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Mesa, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.6 · 93% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #29/47
  • PHOTO CLINE_Nashua, NH
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CLINE_Nashua, NH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Arizona West Builders and Communications, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arizona West Builders and Communications, Inc. averages 2.6 TCR (93% of the Cellular phone tower construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arizona West Builders and Communications, Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.5 · 2017=6.9 · 2018=0 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Arizona West Builders and Communications, Inc. falls in its industry

1,605 Cellular phone tower construct establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 47 Cellular phone tower construct employers in Arizona.

Arizona West Builders and Communications, Inc. (23 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Arizona West Builders and Communications, Inc.
Arizona West Builders and Communications, Inc. (23 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Arizona West Builders and Communications, Inc. has fewer employees than the Cellular phone tower construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.2 5.2 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.9 6.9 2 0 0
2016 3.5 3.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · AZ · Mesa

1,605 Cellular phone tower construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 565 employers in Mesa, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CLINE_Nashua, NH 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alta Mesa Wind Farm 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ANDTN - Atlanta- GA (Downtown) 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rocky Mountain Contractors, Main Office 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nakase Brothers Wholesale Nursery AZ 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eloy Farm 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE McClintock Dairy, LLP - MDL266 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coolidge 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZ001 4,193 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZAPW9668 AZA - RAMP PAX 3,181 FTE
CITY-NEAR 04-290370278-2 1,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Police Department H210 1,651 FTE
NAT-TCR Gulf States Protective Coatings, INC. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hollidaysburg Hometown Market 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Harvey Building Products- Londonderry Manufacturing 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ward Leonard CT LLC 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Therm Tec, Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mountain View Co-op Lincoln Retail 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE LindenGrove Communities - Mukwonago Court 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE UW Pack Forest 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.