Containers for packaging, bottling, and canning, glass, manufacturing · Arkansas

Arkansas Glass Container Corporation

Jonesboro, AR · ~222 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arkansas Glass Container Corporation runs at 254% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Containers for packaging, bottling, and canning, glass, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Arkansas Glass Container Corporation: 8.4 TCR = 254% of Containers for packaging, bottling, and canning, glass, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arkansas Glass Container Corporation safety composite

Arkansas Glass Container Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2016→2024

Arkansas Glass Container Corporation injury rate improved

Arkansas Glass Container Corporation's TCR fell 4.1 from 9.2 in 2016 to 5.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.2 · 2018=12.3 · 2019=11.4 · 2020=11.5 · 2021=7.6 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327213 · Jonesboro, AR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 254% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK P8
  • PHOTO Piramal Glass-USA INC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 141 inj
  • SIZE ~222 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Piramal Glass-USA INC (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Arkansas Glass Container Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arkansas Glass Container Corporation averages 8.4 TCR (254% of the Containers for packaging, bottling, and canning, glass, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arkansas Glass Container Corporation TCR series: 2016=9.2 · 2018=12.3 · 2019=11.4 · 2020=11.5 · 2021=7.6 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Arkansas Glass Container Corporation falls in its industry

98 Containers for packaging, bott establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Arkansas Glass Container Corporation (222 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 236 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Arkansas Glass Container Corporation
Arkansas Glass Container Corporation (222 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 236 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Arkansas Glass Container Corporation has fewer employees than the Containers for packaging, bottling, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 4.3 12 0 0
2023 4.3 3.0 10 0 0
2022 5.5 4.6 13 0 0
2021 7.6 5.5 18 0 0
2020 11.5 9.4 26 1 0
2019 11.4 6.2 25 1 0
2018 12.3 6.9 22 5 0
2016 9.2 4.4 15 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327213 · AR · Jonesboro

98 Containers for packaging, bottling, and canning, glass, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 169 employers in Jonesboro, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Piramal Glass-USA INC 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Owens-Illinois, Inc. Lapel Plant#8 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nipro Group 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR O-I 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 788 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holman Logistics - Maumelle 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 5433 221 FTE
STATE-SIZE Magnolia Regional Medical Center 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Bernards Medical Center 3,466 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Bernards Hospital 1,975 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hytrol Conveyor Company - Jonesboro 1,366 FTE
CITY-NEAR NEA Baptist Memorial Hospital 1,244 FTE
NAT-TCR Commonwealth Senior Living at Churchland House 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Carlie C's IGA #805 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Corry PA 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR R+L Carriers - DVR 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fresh Meadow Mechanical Corp. 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seymour 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Overhead Door 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Global Mining Denison 222 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.