assisted living community · Virginia

Commonwealth Senior Living at Churchland House

Portsmouth, VA · ~55 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Commonwealth Senior Living at Churchland House runs at 221% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical assisted living community workplace, earning a grade F.

Commonwealth Senior Living at Churchland House: 8.4 TCR = 221% of assisted living community BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Commonwealth Senior Living at Churchland House safety composite

Commonwealth Senior Living at Churchland House scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Commonwealth Senior Living at Churchland House: 0.0 → 6.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 27.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.76× in 2024

Commonwealth Senior Living at Churchland House's TCR rose 6.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 6.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 27.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Portsmouth, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 221% of ind

  • DART 6.4 DART
  • RANK #119/199
  • PHOTO Cypress Place
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cypress Place (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Commonwealth Senior Living at Churchland House in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Commonwealth Senior Living at Churchland House averages 8.4 TCR (221% of the assisted living community BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Commonwealth Senior Living at Churchland House TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=7.8 · 2021=27.7 · 2022=17.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=6.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Commonwealth Senior Living at Churchland House falls in its industry

6,510 assisted living community establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #119 safest of 199 assisted living community employers in Virginia.

Commonwealth Senior Living at Churchland House (55 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Commonwealth Senior Living at Churchland House
Commonwealth Senior Living at Churchland House (55 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Commonwealth Senior Living at Churchland House has more employees than the assisted living community median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.4 6.4 0 3 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 17.5 17.5 0 8 0
2021 27.7 27.7 0 13 0
2020 7.8 7.8 2 2 0
2019 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2018 4.1 2.0 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · VA · Portsmouth

6,510 assisted living community employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 137 employers in Portsmouth, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cypress Place 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Tanque Verde 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10737 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anthology of Olathe 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hendrix 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gregory Pallet & Lumber Roanoke 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trump Vineyard Estates LLC 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE SERVPRO of Chesapeake 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maryview Medical Center 1,724 FTE
CITY-NEAR Virginia International Gateway 926 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ceres Hampton Roads 797 FTE
CITY-NEAR Virginia International Gateway by Virginia Interna 545 FTE
NAT-TCR Corry PA 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Arkansas Glass Container Corporation 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR R+L Carriers - DVR 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Carlie C's IGA #805 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE St. Henry Office 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raleigh Lanehart Electric Co., Inc 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lanehart Electrical Contracotrs, LLC 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Casler Masonry, Inc. 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.