Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Arizona

Arlington Valley, LLC

Arlington, AZ · ~25 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arlington Valley, LLC runs at 112% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade C.

Arlington Valley, LLC: 1.3 TCR = 112% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arlington Valley, LLC safety composite

Arlington Valley, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Arlington Valley, LLC: 0.0 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 4.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Arlington Valley, LLC's TCR rose 3.6 from 0.0 in 2019 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Arlington, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.3 · 112% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/13
  • PHOTO Wheelabrator Frackvi…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wheelabrator Frackville Energy Company Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Arlington Valley, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arlington Valley, LLC averages 1.3 TCR (112% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arlington Valley, LLC TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Arlington Valley, LLC falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 13 Electric power generation, fos employers in Arizona.

Arlington Valley, LLC (25 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Arlington Valley, LLC
Arlington Valley, LLC (25 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Arlington Valley, LLC has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · AZ · Arlington

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 12 employers in Arlington, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wheelabrator Frackville Energy Company Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Generation Fossil Gorgas Steam Plant 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR APR Energy LLC 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prairie State Generating Company, LLC - Power Station 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Camelot Nurseries, Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cholla Livestock 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7892_18701 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yucca Power Plant 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sun Streams 4 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sun Streams 3 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Agave Solar 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sun Streams 2 Solar 72 FTE
NAT-TCR PaperWorks Hastings 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Grassco Landscape Management, LLC 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR SPT Laredo 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR De00000045 Goodwill Industries - Rodney 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE M Contractors, LLC 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE W.S Darley Apparatus 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holbrook Lumber Co Inc 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE ACSCO Products, Inc 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.