Landscape care and maintenance services · Georgia

Grassco Landscape Management, LLC

Atlanta, GA · ~54 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grassco Landscape Management, LLC runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Landscape care and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade A.

Grassco Landscape Management, LLC: 1.3 TCR = 30% of Landscape care and maintenance services BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grassco Landscape Management, LLC safety composite

Grassco Landscape Management, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2018→2024

Grassco Landscape Management, LLC injury rate improved

Grassco Landscape Management, LLC's TCR fell 2.8 from 2.8 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.8 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Atlanta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 30% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/100
  • PHOTO 276704
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 276704 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Grassco Landscape Management, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grassco Landscape Management, LLC averages 1.3 TCR (30% of the Landscape care and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grassco Landscape Management, LLC TCR series: 2018=2.8 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Grassco Landscape Management, LLC falls in its industry

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 100 Landscape care and maintenance employers in Georgia.

Grassco Landscape Management, LLC (54 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Grassco Landscape Management, LLC
Grassco Landscape Management, LLC (54 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Grassco Landscape Management, LLC has more employees than the Landscape care and maintenance services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.8 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2018 2.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · GA · Atlanta

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 276704 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Premier Landscapes & Design, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 175804 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lanoha Nurseries, Inc 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Camilla Hatchery 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blairsville Hatchery 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Three Notch Electric Membership Coperation 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walton EMC - Snellville Office 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR SPT Laredo 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR PaperWorks Hastings 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Twinmed, LLC - Texas 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Arlington Valley, LLC 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Crosby - Little Rock 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forward Electric Inc 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Csms, LLC 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Collier Electrical Services, Inc. 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.