Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Massachusetts

Armbrook Village

Westfield, MA · ~105 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Armbrook Village runs at 466% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Armbrook Village: 17.7 TCR = 466% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Armbrook Village safety composite

Armbrook Village scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 26.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Armbrook Village: 2.5 → 28.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 48.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.5× in 2024

Armbrook Village's TCR rose 25.5 from 2.5 in 2016 to 28.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 48.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Westfield, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 17.7 · 466% of ind

  • DART 26.5 DART
  • RANK #193/210
  • PHOTO MCAP Manassas LLC d/…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 63 inj
  • SIZE ~105 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MCAP Manassas LLC d/b/a Commonwealth Senior Living at Manassas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Armbrook Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Armbrook Village averages 17.7 TCR (466% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Armbrook Village TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=4.9 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=22.7 · 2020=17.2 · 2021=11.3 · 2022=48.9 · 2023=17.5 · 2024=28 · BLS 3.8

Where Armbrook Village falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #193 safest of 210 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

Armbrook Village (105 employees, TCR 17.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Armbrook Village
Armbrook Village (105 employees, TCR 17.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Armbrook Village has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 28.0 26.5 8 11 0
2023 17.5 17.5 8 4 0
2022 48.9 47.4 4 29 0
2021 11.3 10.1 8 1 0
2020 17.2 13.9 12 4 0
2019 22.7 16.2 14 0 0
2018 6.5 6.5 4 0 0
2017 4.9 0.0 3 0 0
2016 2.5 2.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · Westfield

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 84 employers in Westfield, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MCAP Manassas LLC d/b/a Commonwealth Senior Living at Manassas 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parsons House Preston Hollow 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morningside of Shiloh 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benchmark Arbors of Bedford LLC 17.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Manafort-Precision, LLC 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electrical Dynamics, Inc. 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE First Nick Companies 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Springfield MA Sheet Plant 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR BNH - Baystate Noble Hospital 541 FTE
CITY-NEAR CS Wholesale Grocers : Westfield, MA (FDC) 499 FTE
CITY-NEAR Savage Arms, Inc. 405 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2174 401 FTE
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0171 Pasadena 17.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Harrisburg Vending 17.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Texas Towing Corp 17.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Kitchen Cabinet Designers 17.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Perrysburg 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Koppers KRS Field Services 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Merrill - Florence 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shelbyville Manor 105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.