Rest homes with nursing care · Ohio

Armstrong Memory Care Assisted Living

Warren, OH · ~41 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Armstrong Memory Care Assisted Living runs at 148% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Rest homes with nursing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Armstrong Memory Care Assisted Living: 9.6 TCR = 148% of Rest homes with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Armstrong Memory Care Assisted Living safety composite

Armstrong Memory Care Assisted Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2017→2024

Armstrong Memory Care Assisted Living injury rate improved

Armstrong Memory Care Assisted Living's TCR fell 4.4 from 4.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 64.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.4 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=58.8 · 2021=34.0 · 2022=64.1 · 2023=52.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Warren, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 9.6 · 148% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #743/1074
  • PHOTO The Pearl of Hinsdale
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Pearl of Hinsdale (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Armstrong Memory Care Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Armstrong Memory Care Assisted Living averages 9.6 TCR (148% of the Rest homes with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Armstrong Memory Care Assisted Living TCR series: 2017=4.4 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=58.8 · 2021=34 · 2022=64.1 · 2023=52 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Armstrong Memory Care Assisted Living falls in its industry

15,252 Rest homes with nursing care establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #743 safest of 1074 Rest homes with nursing care employers in Ohio.

Armstrong Memory Care Assisted Living (41 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Armstrong Memory Care Assisted Living
Armstrong Memory Care Assisted Living (41 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Armstrong Memory Care Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Rest homes with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 52.0 52.0 1 13 0
2022 64.1 64.1 0 16 0
2021 34.0 34.0 0 9 0
2020 58.8 51.9 2 15 0
2019 6.2 3.1 2 0 0
2018 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2017 4.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · OH · Warren

15,252 Rest homes with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 142 employers in Warren, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Pearl of Hinsdale 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Langhorne Gardens Health and Rehab Center 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cornell Health Services 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Growers LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hoover Gardens & Gifts 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Loadout Building 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harrison Hub FRAC 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lordstown Complex 2,768 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ultium Cells, Lordstown 2,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Homegoods Ohio Merchants LLC 1,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR Warren Hospital 953 FTE
NAT-TCR Schuon Manufacturing Company Inc 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR William C Rott & Son Inc. 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Ivy at Ellington 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Facilities Services 9.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE S04550 - Pine Bluff Hauling 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE S04521 - Covel Gardens RDF 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE 737 Jackson - Blanchard 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03203 - Central Valley Waste Services 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.