Nursing homes · Pennsylvania

Langhorne Gardens Health and Rehab Center

Langhorne, PA · ~109 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Langhorne Gardens Health and Rehab Center runs at 148% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade D.

Langhorne Gardens Health and Rehab Center: 9.6 TCR = 148% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Langhorne Gardens Health and Rehab Center safety composite

Langhorne Gardens Health and Rehab Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Langhorne Gardens Health and Rehab Center: 9.6 → 479.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 479.4 TCR · DART/TCR 9.09× in 2024

Langhorne Gardens Health and Rehab Center's TCR rose 469.8 from 9.6 in 2023 to 479.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 9.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Langhorne, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 9.6 · 148% of ind

  • DART 87.2 DART
  • RANK #522/754
  • PHOTO Armstrong Memory Car…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Armstrong Memory Care Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Langhorne Gardens Health and Rehab Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Langhorne Gardens Health and Rehab Center averages 9.6 TCR (148% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Langhorne Gardens Health and Rehab Center TCR series: 2023=9.6 · 2024=479.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Langhorne Gardens Health and Rehab Center falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #522 safest of 754 Nursing homes employers in Pennsylvania.

Langhorne Gardens Health and Rehab Center (109 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Langhorne Gardens Health and Rehab Center
Langhorne Gardens Health and Rehab Center (109 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Langhorne Gardens Health and Rehab Center has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 479.4 87.2 2 9 0
2023 9.6 9.6 0 9 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Langhorne

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 107 employers in Langhorne, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Armstrong Memory Care Assisted Living 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Pearl of Hinsdale 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cornell Health Services 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pittsburgh Operations 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE HRV Conformance Verification Associates, Inc. 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.C. Lee Construction and Supply Company, Inc 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Neshaminy Electrical Contractors, Inc. 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary Medical Center 2,583 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woods Services 2,111 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary Medical Center Hospital Langhorne-SMMC-PA 1,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR 42-018114074-8 1,484 FTE
NAT-TCR West Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cleburne Metal Works dba Cleburne Sheet Metal 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR US Foods Manassas 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cornell Health Services 9.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Lhp Portneuf Food 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Civano Growers 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sensient Flavors, LLC 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE El Rio Grande Latin Market #2 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.